What makes lithium substituted polyacrylic acid a better binder than polyacrylic acid for silicon-graphite composite anodes?

Kevin A. Hays, Rose E. Ruther, Alexander J. Kukay, Pengfei Cao, Tomonori Saito, David L. Wood, Jianlin Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

82 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lithium substituted polyacrylic acid (LiPAA) has previously been demonstrated as a superior binder over polyacrylic acid (PAA) for Si anodes, but from where does this enhanced performance arise? In this study, full cells are assembled with PAA and LiPAA based Si-graphite composite anodes that dried at temperatures from 100 °C to 200 °C. The performance of full cells containing PAA based Si-graphite anodes largely depend on the secondary drying temperature, as decomposition of the binder is correlated to increased electrode moisture and a rise in cell impedance. Full cells containing LiPAA based Si-graphite composite electrodes display better Coulombic efficiency than those with PAA, because of the electrochemical reduction of the PAA binder. This is identified by attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectrometry and observed gassing during the electrochemical reaction. Coulombic losses from the PAA and Si SEI, along with depletion of the Si capacity in the anode results in progressive underutilization of the cathode and full cell capacity loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-144
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Power Sources
Volume384
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 30 2018

Funding

This research was conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The work was sponsored by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO). SEM analysis was conducted at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility. We thank Dr. Nidia Gallego for assistance with TGA and Dr. Jagjit Nanda for use of the ATR-FTIR. This research was conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 . The work was sponsored by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) . SEM analysis was conducted at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility. We thank Dr. Nidia Gallego for assistance with TGA and Dr. Jagjit Nanda for use of the ATR-FTIR. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy . The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ).

FundersFunder number
U.S. Department of EnergyDE-AC05-00OR22725
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Vehicle Technologies Office
UT-Battelle

    Keywords

    • Full cells
    • Li ion battery
    • Lithium substituted polyacrylic acid
    • Polyacrylic acid
    • Residual water
    • Si graphite anode

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What makes lithium substituted polyacrylic acid a better binder than polyacrylic acid for silicon-graphite composite anodes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this