Abstract
The benchmark of the interfacial area concentration (IAC) correlations, as well as one and two-group formulation of the Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE), with a new flashing flow dataset is presented. The correlations are observed to consistently overpredict the IAC, especially under elevated pressure conditions. The predictions by the one-group IATE also show a dependence on pressure with the IAC in low-pressure conditions being severely overpredicted. The inadequacy of the correlations and the one-group IATE in handling flashing flow highlights the need for a two-group approach to capture the different mechanisms that govern large cap/slug bubbles. Several Nusselt number correlations are validated and the results are compared. A characteristic length-scale based on the thickness of liquid film in high void fraction flow is proposed for the calculation of Group-2 mass generation rate. The analysis shows that even though the predictions by the two-group IATE are also pressure-sensitive, the accuracy improves drastically compared to the correlations and one-group approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 6643-6654 |
Number of pages | 12 |
State | Published - 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 18th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, NURETH 2019 - Portland, United States Duration: Aug 18 2019 → Aug 23 2019 |
Conference
Conference | 18th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, NURETH 2019 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Portland |
Period | 08/18/19 → 08/23/19 |
Keywords
- Flashing
- Interfacial area concentration
- Mass generation
- Void fraction