Abstract
Quantifying dynamic hydrologic exchange flows (HEFs) within river corridors that experience high-frequency flow variations caused by dam regulations is important for understanding the biogeochemical processes at the river water and groundwater interfaces. Heat has been widely used as a tracer to infer steady-state flow velocities through analytical solutions of heat transport defined by the diurnal temperature signals. Under sub-daily dynamic flow conditions, however, such analytical solutions are not applicable due to the violation of their fundamental assumptions. In this study, we developed a data assimilation-based approach to estimate the sub-daily flux under highly dynamic flow conditions using multi-depth temperature observations at a 5-min resolution. If the hydraulic gradient is measured, Darcy's law was used to calculate the flux with permeability estimated from temperature responses below the riverbed. Otherwise, flux was estimated directly by assimilating multi-depth temperature data at 1- or 2-hr time intervals assuming one-dimensional flow and heat transport governing equation. By comparing estimated fluxes with model-generated synthetic truth, we demonstrated that both schemes have robust performance in estimating fluxes under highly dynamic flow conditions. This data assimilation-based flux estimation method was able to capture the vertical sub-daily fluxes using multi-depth high-resolution temperature data alone, even in the presence of multi-dimensional flow. This approach has been successfully applied to real field temperature data collected at the Hanford site, which experiences highly dynamic HEFs. Our study shows the promise of adopting distributed 1-D temperature monitoring to capture spatial and temporal exchange dynamics in river corridors at a watershed scale or beyond.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e2021WR030735 |
| Journal | Water Resources Research |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Environmental System Science (ESS) Program. This contribution originates from the River Corridor Scientific Focus Area project at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). A portion of the data assimilation method development was supported by Mission Seed funding under PNNL’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program. PNNL is a multiprogram national laboratory operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC06-76RL01830. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Funding for Martin A. Briggs was provided by U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-SC0020339. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Environmental System Science (ESS) Program. This contribution originates from the River Corridor Scientific Focus Area project at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). A portion of the data assimilation method development was supported by Mission Seed funding under PNNL’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program. PNNL is a multiprogram national laboratory operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE‐AC06‐76RL01830. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science under Contract No. DE‐AC02‐05CH11231. Funding for Martin A. Briggs was provided by U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE‐SC0020339. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Keywords
- data assimilation
- heat tracer
- hydrologic exchange flow
- hyporheic zone