Abstract
Uranyl (UO (Formula presented.)) speciation at the liquid/liquid interface is an essential aspect of the mechanism that underlies its extraction as part of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing schemes and environmental remediation of contaminated legacy waste sites. Of particular importance is a detailed perspective of how changing ion concentrations at the liquid interface alter the distribution of hydrated uranyl ion and its interactions with complexing electrolyte counterions relative to the bulk aqueous solution. In this work, classical molecular dynamics simulations have examined uranyl in bulk LiNO (Formula presented.) and in the presence of a hexane interface. UO (Formula presented.) is observed to have both direct coordination with NO (Formula presented.) and outer-sphere interactions via solvent-separated ion-pairing (SSIP), whereas the interaction of Li (Formula presented.) with NO (Formula presented.) (if it occurs) is predominantly as a contact ion-pair (CIP). The variability of uranyl interactions with nitrate is hypothesized to prevent dehydration of uranyl at the interface, and as such the cation concentration is unperturbed in the interfacial region. However, Li (Formula presented.) loses waters of solvation when it is present in the interfacial region, an unfavorable process that causes a Li (Formula presented.) depletion region. Although significant perturbations to ion–ion interactions, solvation, and solvation dynamics are observed in the interfacial region, importantly, this does not change the association constants of uranyl with nitrate. Thus, the experimental association constants, in combination with knowledge of the interfacial ion concentrations, can be used to predict the distribution of interfacial uranyl nitrate complexes. The enhanced concentration of uranyl dinitrate at the interface, caused by excess adsorbed NO (Formula presented.), is highly relevant to extractant ligand design principles as such nitrate complexes that are the reactants in ligand complexation and extraction events.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 165-187 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The authors acknowledge the Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences Separations program (DE-SC0001815) for funding. NK acknowledges the PNNL Distinguished Graduate Research Program for tuition waivers utilized during this work. This research used resources from the Center for Institutional Research Computing at Washington State University. The authors acknowledge the Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences Separations program (DE-SC0001815) for funding. NK acknowledges the PNNL Distinguished Graduate Research Program for tuition waivers utilized during this work. This research used resources from the Center for Institutional Research Computing at Washington State University.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy | DE-SC0001815 |
Washington State University |
Keywords
- PUREX
- Solvent extraction
- actinide chemistry
- complexation
- ion-pairing
- liquid/liquid interface