Abstract
Background. Arsenic is toxic to plants and a common environmental pollutant. There is a strong chemical similarity between arsenate [As (V)] and phosphate (Pi). Whole genome oligonucleotide microarrays were employed to investigate the transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana plants to As (V) stress. Results. Antioxidant-related genes (i.e. coding for superoxide dismutases and peroxidases) play prominent roles in response to arsenate. The microarray experiment revealed induction of chloroplast Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) (at2g28190), Cu/Zn SOD (at1g08830), as well as an SOD copper chaperone (at1g12520). On the other hand, Fe SODs were strongly repressed in response to As (V) stress. Non-parametric rank product statistics were used to detect differentially expressed genes. Arsenate stress resulted in the repression of numerous genes known to be induced by phosphate starvation. These observations were confirmed with qRT-PCR and SOD activity assays. Conclusion. Microarray data suggest that As (V) induces genes involved in response to oxidative stress and represses transcription of genes induced by phosphate starvation. This study implicates As (V) as a phosphate mimic in the cell by repressing genes normally induced when available phosphate is scarce. Most importantly, these data reveal that arsenate stress affects the expression of several genes with little or unknown biological functions, thereby providing new putative gene targets for future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 87 |
Journal | BMC Plant Biology |
Volume | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
We appreciate our collaborators at Edenspace Systems Corporation for their valuable cooperation, especially, Mark Elless, David Lee, and Bruce Ferguson. We thank Laura Abercrombie and Reggie Millwood for technical assistance. Funding was provided by NIH and NSF grants as well as the Tennessee Agriculture Experiment Station and the Ivan Racheff Endowment. We would also like to thank the BMC Plant Biology editors and 4 anonymous reviewers for their thorough reviews and constructive criticism of this manuscript.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Ivan Racheff Endowment | |
National Science Foundation | |
National Institutes of Health | |
Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station |