Abstract
This research examines the economic implications of different designs for a national low carbon fuel standard (NLCFS) for the road transportation sector. A NLCFS based on the average Carbon Intensity (CI) of all fuels sold generates an incentive for fuel suppliers to reduce the measured CI of their fuels. The economic impacts are determined by the availability of low carbon fuels, estimates of which can vary widely. Also important are the compliance path, reference level CI, and the design of the credit system, particularly the opportunities for trading and banking. To quantitatively examine the implications of a NLCFS, we created the Transportation Regulation and Credit Trading (TRACT) Model. With TRACT, we model a NLCFS credit trading system among profit maximizing fuel suppliers for light- and heavy-duty vehicle fuel use for the United States from 2012 to 2030. We find that credit trading across gasoline and diesel fuel markets can lower the average costs of carbon reductions by an insignificant amount to 98% depending on forecasts of biofuel supplies and carbon intensities. Adding banking of credits on top of trading can further lower the average cost of carbon reductions by 5%-9% and greatly reduce year-to-year fluctuations in credit prices.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 16-28 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Energy Policy |
Volume | 56 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2013 |
Funding
We thank Maxwell L. Brown and Catherine Dickerson for their research assistance and support. We also thank 3 anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The study has received financial support from the Energy Foundation. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent those of any sponsoring organization.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Energy Foundation |
Keywords
- Credit trading
- Greenhouse gas emissions
- Transportation