Towards automating structural discovery in scanning transmission electron microscopy

Nicole Creange, Ondrej Dyck, Rama K. Vasudevan, Maxim Ziatdinov, Sergei V. Kalinin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scanning transmission electron microscopy is now the primary tool for exploring functional materials on the atomic level. Often, features of interest are highly localized in specific regions in the material, such as ferroelectric domain walls, extended defects, or second phase inclusions. Selecting regions to image for structural and chemical discovery via atomically resolved imaging has traditionally proceeded via human operators making semi-informed judgements on sampling locations and parameters. Recent efforts at automation for structural and physical discovery have pointed towards the use of 'active learning' methods that utilize Bayesian optimization with surrogate models to quickly find relevant regions of interest. Yet despite the potential importance of this direction, there is a general lack of certainty in selecting relevant control algorithms and how to balance a priori knowledge of the material system with knowledge derived during experimentation. Here we address this gap by developing the automated experiment workflows with several combinations to both illustrate the effects of these choices and demonstrate the tradeoffs associated with each in terms of accuracy, robustness, and susceptibility to hyperparameters for structural discovery. We discuss possible methods to build descriptors using the raw image data and deep learning based semantic segmentation, as well as the implementation of variational autoencoder based representation. Furthermore, each workflow is applied to a range of feature sizes including NiO pillars within a La:SrMnO3 matrix, ferroelectric domains in BiFeO3, and topological defects in graphene. The code developed in this manuscript is open sourced and will be released at github.com/nccreang/AE_Workflows.

Original languageEnglish
Article number015024
JournalMachine Learning: Science and Technology
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2022

Funding

This effort (ML and STEM) is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division (OD, SVK) and was performed and partially supported (RVK, MZ) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science User Facility. We thank Jacob Swett for preparing and providing the graphene sample, Wenrui Zhang and Gyula Eres for the preparation and providing the NiO-LSMO sample, Matthew Chisholm for acquiring the NiO-LSMO STEM data, Ziaohang Zhang and Ichiro Takeuchi for preparing and providing the Sm-BFO sample and Chris Nelson for acquiring the Sm-BFO STEM data.

Keywords

  • Bayesian optimization
  • STEM
  • automated experiments
  • data acquisition workflows

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards automating structural discovery in scanning transmission electron microscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this