TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models
AU - Luo, Yiqi
AU - Ahlström, Anders
AU - Allison, Steven D.
AU - Batjes, Niels H.
AU - Brovkin, Victor
AU - Carvalhais, Nuno
AU - Chappell, Adrian
AU - Ciais, Philippe
AU - Davidson, Eric A.
AU - Finzi, Adien
AU - Georgiou, Katerina
AU - Guenet, Bertrand
AU - Hararuk, Oleksandra
AU - Harden, Jennifer W.
AU - He, Yujie
AU - Hopkins, Francesca
AU - Jiang, Lifen
AU - Koven, Charlie
AU - Jackson, Robert B.
AU - Jones, Chris D.
AU - Lara, Mark J.
AU - Liang, Junyi
AU - McGuire, A. David
AU - Parton, William
AU - Peng, Changhui
AU - Randerson, James T.
AU - Salazar, Alejandro
AU - Sierra, Carlos A.
AU - Smith, Matthew J.
AU - Tian, Hanqin
AU - Todd-Brown, Katherine E.O.
AU - Torn, Margaret
AU - Van Groenigen, Kees Jan
AU - Wang, Ying Ping
AU - West, Tristram O.
AU - Wei, Yaxing
AU - Wieder, William R.
AU - Xia, Jianyang
AU - Xu, Xia
AU - Xu, Xiaofeng
AU - Zhou, Tao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Soil carbon (C) is a critical component of Earth system models (ESMs), and its diverse representations are a major source of the large spread across models in the terrestrial C sink from the third to fifth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Improving soil C projections is of a high priority for Earth system modeling in the future IPCC and other assessments. To achieve this goal, we suggest that (1) model structures should reflect real-world processes, (2) parameters should be calibrated to match model outputs with observations, and (3) external forcing variables should accurately prescribe the environmental conditions that soils experience. First, most soil C cycle models simulate C input from litter production and C release through decomposition. The latter process has traditionally been represented by first-order decay functions, regulated primarily by temperature, moisture, litter quality, and soil texture. While this formulation well captures macroscopic soil organic C (SOC) dynamics, better understanding is needed of their underlying mechanisms as related to microbial processes, depth-dependent environmental controls, and other processes that strongly affect soil C dynamics. Second, incomplete use of observations in model parameterization is a major cause of bias in soil C projections from ESMs. Optimal parameter calibration with both pool- and flux-based data sets through data assimilation is among the highest priorities for near-term research to reduce biases among ESMs. Third, external variables are represented inconsistently among ESMs, leading to differences in modeled soil C dynamics. We recommend the implementation of traceability analyses to identify how external variables and model parameterizations influence SOC dynamics in different ESMs. Overall, projections of the terrestrial C sink can be substantially improved when reliable data sets are available to select the most representative model structure, constrain parameters, and prescribe forcing fields.
AB - Soil carbon (C) is a critical component of Earth system models (ESMs), and its diverse representations are a major source of the large spread across models in the terrestrial C sink from the third to fifth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Improving soil C projections is of a high priority for Earth system modeling in the future IPCC and other assessments. To achieve this goal, we suggest that (1) model structures should reflect real-world processes, (2) parameters should be calibrated to match model outputs with observations, and (3) external forcing variables should accurately prescribe the environmental conditions that soils experience. First, most soil C cycle models simulate C input from litter production and C release through decomposition. The latter process has traditionally been represented by first-order decay functions, regulated primarily by temperature, moisture, litter quality, and soil texture. While this formulation well captures macroscopic soil organic C (SOC) dynamics, better understanding is needed of their underlying mechanisms as related to microbial processes, depth-dependent environmental controls, and other processes that strongly affect soil C dynamics. Second, incomplete use of observations in model parameterization is a major cause of bias in soil C projections from ESMs. Optimal parameter calibration with both pool- and flux-based data sets through data assimilation is among the highest priorities for near-term research to reduce biases among ESMs. Third, external variables are represented inconsistently among ESMs, leading to differences in modeled soil C dynamics. We recommend the implementation of traceability analyses to identify how external variables and model parameterizations influence SOC dynamics in different ESMs. Overall, projections of the terrestrial C sink can be substantially improved when reliable data sets are available to select the most representative model structure, constrain parameters, and prescribe forcing fields.
KW - CMIP5
KW - Earth system models
KW - realistic projections
KW - recommendations
KW - soil carbon dynamics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956641600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2015GB005239
DO - 10.1002/2015GB005239
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84956641600
SN - 0886-6236
VL - 30
SP - 40
EP - 56
JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
IS - 1
ER -