Toward Guided Mutagenesis: Gaussian Process Regression Predicts MHC Class II Antigen Mutant Binding

David R. Bell, Serena H. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASI) require successful loading and presentation of antigen peptides into the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding cleft. One route of ASI design is to mutate native antigens for either stronger or weaker binding interaction to MHC. Exploring all possible mutations is costly both experimentally and computationally. To reduce experimental and computational expense, here we investigate the minimal amount of prior data required to accurately predict the relative binding affinity of point mutations for peptide-MHC class II (pMHCII) binding. Using data from different residue subsets, we interpolate pMHCII mutant binding affinities by Gaussian process (GP) regression of residue volume and hydrophobicity. We apply GP regression to an experimental data set from the Immune Epitope Database, and theoretical data sets from NetMHCIIpan and Free Energy Perturbation calculations. We find that GP regression can predict binding affinities of nine neutral residues from a six-residue subset with an average R2 coefficient of determination value of 0.62 ± 0.04 (±95% CI), average error of 0.09 ± 0.01 kcal/mol (±95% CI), and with an receiver operating characteristic (ROC) AUC value of 0.92 for binary classification of enhanced or diminished binding affinity. Similarly, metrics increase to an R2 value of 0.69 ± 0.04, average error of 0.07 ± 0.01 kcal/mol, and an ROC AUC value of 0.94 for predicting seven neutral residues from an eight-residue subset. Our work finds that prediction is most accurate for neutral residues at anchor residue sites without register shift. This work holds relevance to predicting pMHCII binding and accelerating ASI design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4857-4867
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Volume61
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 2021

Funding

The authors would like to thank Leili Zhang, Guojing Cong, Giacomo Domeniconi, Chih-Chieh Yang, Ruhong Zhou, Jeffrey K Weber, and Sangyun Lee for insightful discussions. S.H.C. would like to acknowledge Program Development funding from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which helped spur this collaboration. Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract no. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

FundersFunder number
National Institutes of HealthHHSN261200800001E
U.S. Department of Energy
National Cancer Institute
Oak Ridge National LaboratoryDE-AC05-00OR22725

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Toward Guided Mutagenesis: Gaussian Process Regression Predicts MHC Class II Antigen Mutant Binding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this