Thorium: Not a near-term commercial nuclear fuel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the wake of the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, opinion makers and policy makers, alike, have worked internationally to pique interest in thorium as a possible alternative fuel for commercial nuclear reactors. The key question posed has been: Could a thorium-based fuel provide advantages if deployed in current reactors? A full thorium-driven cycle used to produce and use uranium-233 for power generation has been understood to possess a range of benefits for many decades. To fully assess the practical utility of thorium use in existing light water reactors, it is necessary to critically dissect the promoted benefits of the thorium fuel cycle. The potential advantages of thorium are relatively small, the author writes, when viewed through the lens of current infrastructure and economic and political realities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-44
Number of pages12
JournalBulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Volume68
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • light water reactors
  • nuclear fuel
  • thorium
  • thorium uranium dioxide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thorium: Not a near-term commercial nuclear fuel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this