Abstract
Fracture pattern development has been a challenging area of research in the Earth sciences for more than 100 years. Much has been learned about the spatial and temporal complexity inherent to these systems, but severe challenges remain. Future advances will require new approaches. Chemical processes play a larger role in opening-mode fracture pattern development than has hitherto been appreciated. This review examines relationships between mechanical and geochemical processes that influence the fracture patterns recorded in natural settings. For fractures formed in diagenetic settings (~50 to 200 °C), we review evidence of chemical reactions in fractures and show how a chemical perspective helps solve problems in fracture analysis. We also outline impediments to subsurface pattern measurement and interpretation, assess implications of discoveries in fracture history reconstruction for process-based models, review models of fracture cementation and chemically assisted fracture growth, and discuss promising paths for future work. To accurately predict the mechanical and fluid flow properties of fracture systems, a processes-based approach is needed. Progress is possible using observational, experimental, and modeling approaches that view fracture patterns and properties as the result of coupled mechanical and chemical processes. A critical area is reconstructing patterns through time. Such data sets are essential for developing and testing predictive models. Other topics that need work include models of crystal growth and dissolution rates under geological conditions, cement mechanical effects, and subcritical crack propagation. Advances in machine learning and 3-D imaging present opportunities for a mechanistic understanding of fracture formation and development, enabling prediction of spatial and temporal complexity over geologic timescales. Geophysical research with a chemical perspective is needed to correctly identify and interpret fractures from geophysical measurements during site characterization and monitoring of subsurface engineering activities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1065-1111 |
| Number of pages | 47 |
| Journal | Reviews of Geophysics |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2019 |
Funding
This manuscript resulted from discussions at a workshop sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science (SC), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences (CSGB) Division that was held in Leesburg, Virginia, in May 2016. We are grateful to James Rustad for his leadership, contributions to discussions at the workshop, and encouragement and support during the preparation of this review. S. E. L. appreciates support in organizing and conducting the workshop and preparing the paper from Grant DE-FG02-03ER15430 from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-NA0003525. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a multiprogram national laboratory operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the U.S. DOE. Contributions from ORNL, SNL and PNNL are based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. DOE or the U.S. Government. J. L. U. acknowledges funding by the German Science Foundation Project NE 822/34-1|UR 64/17-1. We also value discussions with P. Eichhubl, A. Fall, and J. F. W. Gale, contributions to workshop preparation from R. A. Schultz, and discussion and comments from R. Cygan, S.F. Forstner, Q. Wang, and journal reviewers. No data were used in the preparation of this manuscript.
Keywords
- CO sequestration
- crack seal
- fractured reservoir
- quartz
- shale
- unconventional resources