The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region

Jinzhi Ding; Tao Wang; Shilong Piao; Pete Smith; Ganlin Zhang; Zhengjie Yan; Shuai Ren; Dan Liu; Shiping Wang; Shengyun Chen; Fuqiang Dai; Jinsheng He; Yingnian Li; Yongwen Liu; Jiafu Mao; Altaf Arain; Hanqin Tian; Xiaoying Shi; Yuanhe Yang; Ning Zeng; Lin Zhao

doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5

The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region

Jinzhi Ding, Tao Wang, Shilong Piao, Pete Smith, Ganlin Zhang, Zhengjie Yan, Shuai Ren, Dan Liu, Shiping Wang, Shengyun Chen, Fuqiang Dai, Jinsheng He, Yingnian Li, Yongwen Liu, Jiafu Mao, Altaf Arain, Hanqin Tian, Xiaoying Shi, Yuanhe Yang, Ning ZengLin Zhao

Earth Systems Modeling

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tibetan permafrost largely formed during the late Pleistocene glacial period and shrank in the Holocene Thermal Maximum period. Quantifying the impacts of paleoclimatic extremes on soil carbon stock can shed light on the vulnerability of permafrost carbon in the future. Here, we synthesize data from 1114 sites across the Tibetan permafrost region to report that paleoclimate is more important than modern climate in shaping current permafrost carbon distribution, and its importance increases with soil depth, mainly through forming the soilʼs physiochemical properties. We derive a new estimate of modern soil carbon stock to 3 m depth by including the paleoclimate effects, and find that the stock (36.6-2.4+2.3 PgC) is triple that predicted by ecosystem models (11.5 ± 4.2 s.e.m PgC), which use pre-industrial climate to initialize the soil carbon pool. The discrepancy highlights the urgent need to incorporate paleoclimate information into model initialization for simulating permafrost soil carbon stocks.

Original language	English
Article number	4195
Journal	Nature Communications
Volume	10
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5
State	Published - Dec 1 2019

Funding

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (A) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20050101), the second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0606), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871104, 41530528), and Key Research and Development Programs for Global Change and Adaptation (2017YFA0603604). Jinzhi Ding acknowledges the General (2017M620922) and the Special Grade (2018T110144) of the Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

Access to Document

10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5

Cite this

Ding, J., Wang, T., Piao, S., Smith, P., Zhang, G., Yan, Z., Ren, S., Liu, D., Wang, S., Chen, S., Dai, F., He, J., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Mao, J., Arain, A., Tian, H., Shi, X., Yang, Y., ... Zhao, L. (2019). The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 4195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5

@article{eed2a6520a3e405484b5b1a2e82732ec,

title = "The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region",

abstract = "Tibetan permafrost largely formed during the late Pleistocene glacial period and shrank in the Holocene Thermal Maximum period. Quantifying the impacts of paleoclimatic extremes on soil carbon stock can shed light on the vulnerability of permafrost carbon in the future. Here, we synthesize data from 1114 sites across the Tibetan permafrost region to report that paleoclimate is more important than modern climate in shaping current permafrost carbon distribution, and its importance increases with soil depth, mainly through forming the soilʼs physiochemical properties. We derive a new estimate of modern soil carbon stock to 3 m depth by including the paleoclimate effects, and find that the stock (36.6-2.4+2.3 PgC) is triple that predicted by ecosystem models (11.5 ± 4.2 s.e.m PgC), which use pre-industrial climate to initialize the soil carbon pool. The discrepancy highlights the urgent need to incorporate paleoclimate information into model initialization for simulating permafrost soil carbon stocks.",

author = "Jinzhi Ding and Tao Wang and Shilong Piao and Pete Smith and Ganlin Zhang and Zhengjie Yan and Shuai Ren and Dan Liu and Shiping Wang and Shengyun Chen and Fuqiang Dai and Jinsheng He and Yingnian Li and Yongwen Liu and Jiafu Mao and Altaf Arain and Hanqin Tian and Xiaoying Shi and Yuanhe Yang and Ning Zeng and Lin Zhao",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, The Author(s).",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

journal = "Nature Communications",

issn = "2041-1723",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region

AU - Ding, Jinzhi

AU - Wang, Tao

AU - Piao, Shilong

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Zhang, Ganlin

AU - Yan, Zhengjie

AU - Ren, Shuai

AU - Liu, Dan

AU - Wang, Shiping

AU - Chen, Shengyun

AU - Dai, Fuqiang

AU - He, Jinsheng

AU - Li, Yingnian

AU - Liu, Yongwen

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Arain, Altaf

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Yang, Yuanhe

AU - Zeng, Ning

AU - Zhao, Lin

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Tibetan permafrost largely formed during the late Pleistocene glacial period and shrank in the Holocene Thermal Maximum period. Quantifying the impacts of paleoclimatic extremes on soil carbon stock can shed light on the vulnerability of permafrost carbon in the future. Here, we synthesize data from 1114 sites across the Tibetan permafrost region to report that paleoclimate is more important than modern climate in shaping current permafrost carbon distribution, and its importance increases with soil depth, mainly through forming the soilʼs physiochemical properties. We derive a new estimate of modern soil carbon stock to 3 m depth by including the paleoclimate effects, and find that the stock (36.6-2.4+2.3 PgC) is triple that predicted by ecosystem models (11.5 ± 4.2 s.e.m PgC), which use pre-industrial climate to initialize the soil carbon pool. The discrepancy highlights the urgent need to incorporate paleoclimate information into model initialization for simulating permafrost soil carbon stocks.

AB - Tibetan permafrost largely formed during the late Pleistocene glacial period and shrank in the Holocene Thermal Maximum period. Quantifying the impacts of paleoclimatic extremes on soil carbon stock can shed light on the vulnerability of permafrost carbon in the future. Here, we synthesize data from 1114 sites across the Tibetan permafrost region to report that paleoclimate is more important than modern climate in shaping current permafrost carbon distribution, and its importance increases with soil depth, mainly through forming the soilʼs physiochemical properties. We derive a new estimate of modern soil carbon stock to 3 m depth by including the paleoclimate effects, and find that the stock (36.6-2.4+2.3 PgC) is triple that predicted by ecosystem models (11.5 ± 4.2 s.e.m PgC), which use pre-industrial climate to initialize the soil carbon pool. The discrepancy highlights the urgent need to incorporate paleoclimate information into model initialization for simulating permafrost soil carbon stocks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072190356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5

DO - 10.1038/s41467-019-12214-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 31519899

AN - SCOPUS:85072190356

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 10

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 4195

ER -

The paleoclimatic footprint in the soil carbon stock of the Tibetan permafrost region

Abstract

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this