The EGS Collab hydroshear experiment at the Sanford underground research facility - Siting criteria and evaluation of candidate sites

EGS Collab Team

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of the EGS Collab project is to establish a suite of intermediate-scale (~10-20 m) field test beds coupled with stimulation and interwell flow tests to provide a basis to better understand fracture stimulation methods, resulting fracture geometries, and processes that control heat transfer between rock and stimulated fractures. Experiment 1 of the project is being conducted at a depth of ~1.5 km in the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) on the 4850 Level (ft. below the ground surface). The stimulation method planned for Experiment 2 of this project is hydroshearing of an existing natural fracture. In siting this experiment, there are several key geologic criteria that need to be met. These include: 1) the fracture should be least 10 m in length so that it could be intersected by two boreholes that are spaced that far apart; 2) it should be optimally oriented relevant to the stress field so that it is critically stressed; 3) the site should have appropriate stress conditions (not too shallow a depth); 4) the fracture should have sufficient permeability to allow for prestimulation flow testing, but not too high a permeability that would preclude permeability enhancement via shear stimulation; 5) the fracture should not intersect other features (permeable fractures, boreholes, adjacent drifts) that could serve as major leak-off zones; 6) the site should not be complicated by geology (a single lithology would be preferred). In addition, there are logistical criteria that will also influence site selection, including: 1) site availability/access, 2) logistical support, e.g., power, internet, water, operating rail system; 3) drift size and orientation compatible with drilling and site operations; 4) appropriate ground support. There are only two deep levels at SURF that can be accessed by the Yates Shaft: the 4100 and the 4850, so we limited our search to these two levels. Currently, three candidate sites are being evaluated: the existing Experiment 1 site and its surroundings on the West Drift on the 4850 level, and two locations on the 4100 level. This paper will evaluate advantages, disadvantages, and risks associated with these three options at SURF.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGeothermal's Role in Today's Energy Market - Geothermal Resources Council 2018 Annual Meeting, GRC 2018
PublisherGeothermal Resources Council
Pages708-723
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)0934412235
StatePublished - 2018
EventGeothermal Resources Council 2018 Annual Meeting: Geothermal's Role in Today's Energy Market, GRC 2018 - Reno, United States
Duration: Oct 14 2018Oct 17 2018

Publication series

NameTransactions - Geothermal Resources Council
Volume42
ISSN (Print)0193-5933

Conference

ConferenceGeothermal Resources Council 2018 Annual Meeting: Geothermal's Role in Today's Energy Market, GRC 2018
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityReno
Period10/14/1810/17/18

Funding

This material was based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Technology Development, Geothermal Technologies Program, under Award Number DE-AC02-05CH11231 with LBNL and other subcontracts. The United States Government retains, and the publisher by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The research supporting this work took place in whole or in part at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota. The assistance of the Sanford Underground Research Facility and its personnel in providing physical access and general logistical and technical support is gratefully acknowledged; we thank Kathy Hart and Jaret Heise for providing geologic maps of the Homestake Mine. The hydrostructural model was created using Golder's FracMan software. The earth model output of the fractures was generated using Leapfrog Software. Copyright © Aranz Geo Limited. Leapfrog and all other Aranz Geo Limited product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Aranz Geo Limited. This material was based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Technology Development, Geothermal Technologies Program, under Award Number DE-AC02-05CH11231 with LBNL and other subcontracts. The United States Government retains, and the publisher by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The research supporting this work took place in whole or in part at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota. The assistance of the Sanford Underground Research Facility and its personnel in providing physical access and general logistical and technical support is gratefully acknowledged; we thank Kathy Hart and Jaret Heise for providing geologic maps of the Homestake Mine. The hydrostructural model was created using Golder’s FracMan software. The earth model output of the fractures was generated using Leapfrog Software. Copyright © Aranz Geo Limited. Leapfrog and all other Aranz Geo Limited product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Aranz Geo Limited.

FundersFunder number
U.S. Department of Energy
Sanfilippo Research Foundation
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Geothermal Technologies Program
Office of Technology DevelopmentDE-AC02-05CH11231
Office of Technology Development
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
U.S. Navy

    Keywords

    • EGS Collab
    • Hydroshear
    • Natural fractures
    • Siting criteria
    • Slip tendency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The EGS Collab hydroshear experiment at the Sanford underground research facility - Siting criteria and evaluation of candidate sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this