The case for and against a gadolinium bias in scale: Opening arguments

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-557
Number of pages4
JournalTransactions of the American Nuclear Society
Volume118
StatePublished - 2018
Event2018 Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, ANS 2018 and Embedded Topical Meeting Nuclear Fuels and Structural Materials - Philadelphia, United States
Duration: Jun 17 2018Jun 21 2018

Funding

The preparation and presentation of this paper was supported by the US Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program. * Notice: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

FundersFunder number
US Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
Nuclear Energy University Program

    Cite this