TY - JOUR
T1 - The 2019 MRV challenge
T2 - turbulent flow through a U-bend
AU - Benson, Michael J.
AU - Banko, Andrew J.
AU - Elkins, Christopher J.
AU - An, Don Gwan
AU - Song, Simon
AU - Bruschewski, Martin
AU - Grundmann, Sven
AU - Borup, Daniel D.
AU - Eaton, John K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Abstract: While magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) has been used in technological flow studies for over 30 years, it has not yet reached the levels of usage as more traditional experimental techniques such as particle image velocimetry or laser Doppler anemometry. This work involves a relatively simple U-bend geometry with complex three-dimensional turbulent flow characteristics which was shared with four research groups, including a combined effort from the U.S. Military Academy/Stanford University, and teams from Hanyang University, the University of Rostock, and the Mayo Clinic. The geometry—including upstream flow development—was shipped between groups with nominally similar experimental conditions, and the acquired data are presented including both two- and three-dimensional comparisons. In addition, details on how each team conducted the MRV experiments are provided, with each team using a different set of procedures and hardware. The results are remarkably similar, with only a few variations at the flow regions with the highest in-plane velocity gradients showing differences outside the combined uncertainty of the results. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
AB - Abstract: While magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) has been used in technological flow studies for over 30 years, it has not yet reached the levels of usage as more traditional experimental techniques such as particle image velocimetry or laser Doppler anemometry. This work involves a relatively simple U-bend geometry with complex three-dimensional turbulent flow characteristics which was shared with four research groups, including a combined effort from the U.S. Military Academy/Stanford University, and teams from Hanyang University, the University of Rostock, and the Mayo Clinic. The geometry—including upstream flow development—was shipped between groups with nominally similar experimental conditions, and the acquired data are presented including both two- and three-dimensional comparisons. In addition, details on how each team conducted the MRV experiments are provided, with each team using a different set of procedures and hardware. The results are remarkably similar, with only a few variations at the flow regions with the highest in-plane velocity gradients showing differences outside the combined uncertainty of the results. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086407409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00348-020-02986-8
DO - 10.1007/s00348-020-02986-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086407409
SN - 0723-4864
VL - 61
JO - Experiments in Fluids
JF - Experiments in Fluids
IS - 6
M1 - 148
ER -