Abstract
Researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) perform fungal research and developm derived data, four different ethanologen strains are considered in this study: native and recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae , the natural pentose-fermenting yeast, Pichia stipitis and the filamentous fungus Fusarium oxysporum In addition, filamentous fungi are applied in multi-organism and consolidated process configurations. Organism performance and technology readiness are categorized as near-term (<5. years), mid-term (5-10. years), and long-term (>10. years) process deployment. Processes classified as near-term could reasonably be developed in this shorter time frame, as suggested by recent literature. Mid-term technology process models are based on published lab-scale experimental data. Yields near the theoretical limit are classified as long-term technology goals. Among the four ethanologen strains, recombinant S. cerevisiae provides the most attractive process economics as defined by the lowest Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP). This also falls in a range of the model analysis results suggested by literature based on different feedstock and organisms. Moreover, the analysis of mid-term and long-term processes shows improved profitability, revenue and process economics when co-producing chemicals on-site is applied, resulting in 1.98$/gallon of ethanol from a mid-term process scenario. The results of the analysis suggest that the opportunity for fungal fermentation exists for lignocellulosic ethanol production.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 657-668 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Applied Energy |
Volume | 111 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The authors greatly appreciate the support of Leslie Pezzullo and Joyce Yang of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s Bioenergy Technologies Office. We thank Sandra Tjokro Rahardjo (former PNNL employee) and Yunhua Zhu, a research engineer at PNNL, for their simulation work during the early stage of the project. We are grateful to our PNNL internal reviewers, Johnathan Male, Corinne Valkenburg and Mark Butcher.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s Bioenergy Technologies Office | |
U.S. Department of Energy |
Keywords
- Consolidated
- Ethanol
- Fermentation
- Fungi
- Lignocellulosic
- Techno-economic