Synthesis method comparison of compositionally complex rare earth-based Ruddlesden–Popper n = 1 T′-type cuprates

Brianna L. Musicó, Quinton Wright, Cordell Delzer, T. Zac Ward, Claudia J. Rawn, David G. Mandrus, Veerle Keppens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The multicomponent approach has been successfully expanded to the Ruddlesden–Popper structure with the synthesis of two different high-entropy cuprate compositions: (La0.2Nd0.2Gd0.2Tb0.2Dy0.2)2CuO4 and (La0.2Pr0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2)2CuO4. The effect of synthesis method is explored using both solid-state reaction and polymeric steric entrapment (PSE) methods. It is found that PSE leads to more randomly distributed cation species, providing an advantageous method of synthesis for the growing field of high entropy oxides. In situ high-temperature x-ray diffraction tracks the amorphous to crystalline phase transformation in (La0.2Nd0.2Gd0.2Tb0.2Dy0.2)2CuO4 powder, synthesized using the PSE method. Using the High-Temperature XRD data, a method for gaining information on the kinetic behavior is also applied. Magnetometry of both compositions indicates ferrimagnetic behavior at low temperatures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3750-3759
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Ceramic Society
Volume104
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

Funding

B.L.M. acknowledges the support of the Center for Materials Processing, a Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC) supported Accomplished Center of Excellence. T.Z.W. was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), and Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. D.G.M acknowledges support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative, Grant GBMF9069. Powder XRD and microscopy was performed at the Joint Institute for Advanced Materials (JIAM) Diffraction Facility, and Microscopy Facility, respectively, located at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. C.D. acknowledges support by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration through the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium under Award Number DE‐NA0003180. This paper was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or limited, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. B.L.M. acknowledges the support of the Center for Materials Processing, a Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC) supported Accomplished Center of Excellence. T.Z.W. was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), and Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. D.G.M acknowledges support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative, Grant GBMF9069. Powder XRD and microscopy was performed at the Joint Institute for Advanced Materials (JIAM) Diffraction Facility, and Microscopy Facility, respectively, located at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. C.D. acknowledges support by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration through the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium under Award Number DE-NA0003180. This paper was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or limited, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Keywords

  • kinetics
  • oxides
  • phase transformations
  • synthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synthesis method comparison of compositionally complex rare earth-based Ruddlesden–Popper n = 1 T′-type cuprates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this