Superconducting radio frequency cavity degradation due to errant beam

C. Peters, A. Aleksandrov, W. Blokland, M. Crofford, D. Curry, C. Deibele, G. Dodson, J. Galambos, G. Johns, A. Justice, S. Kim, T. Pelaia, M. Plum, A. Shishlo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2009, the Superconducting Radio Frequency (SRF) cavities at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) began to experience significant operational degradation [1]. The source of the degradation was found to be repeated striking of cavity surfaces with errant beam pulses. The Machine Protection System (MPS) was designed to turn the beam off during a fault condition in less than 20 μseconds [2] as these errant beam pulses were not unexpected. Unfortunately an improperly operating MPS was not turning off the beam within the designed 20 μseconds, and the SRF cavities were being damaged. The MPS issues were corrected, and the SRF performance was restored with cavity thermal cycling and RF processing. However, the SRF cavity performance has continued to degrade, though at a reduced rate compared to 2009. This paper will detail further study of errant beam frequency, amount lost per event, causes, and the corrective actions imposed since the initial event.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication6th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC 2015
PublisherJoint Accelerator Conferences Website (JACoW)
Pages805-807
Number of pages3
ISBN (Electronic)9783954501687
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event6th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC 2015 - Richmond, United States
Duration: May 3 2015May 8 2015

Publication series

Name6th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC 2015

Conference

Conference6th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC 2015
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityRichmond
Period05/3/1505/8/15

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Superconducting radio frequency cavity degradation due to errant beam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this