Stored carbon partly fuels fine-root respiration but is not used for production of new fine roots

Douglas J. Lynch, Roser Matamala, Colleen M. Iversen, Richard J. Norby, Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relative use of new photosynthate compared to stored carbon (C) for the production and maintenance of fine roots, and the rate of C turnover in heterogeneous fine-root populations, are poorly understood. We followed the relaxation of a 13C tracer in fine roots in a Liquidambar styraciflua plantation at the conclusion of a free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. Goals included quantifying the relative fractions of new photosynthate vs stored C used in root growth and root respiration, as well as the turnover rate of fine-root C fixed during [CO2] fumigation. New fine-root growth was largely from recent photosynthate, while nearly one-quarter of respired C was from a storage pool. Changes in the isotopic composition of the fine-root population over two full growing seasons indicated heterogeneous C pools; < 10% of root C had a residence time < 3 months, while a majority of root C had a residence time > 2 yr. Compared to a one-pool model, a two-pool model for C turnover in fine roots (with 5 and 0.37 yr-1 turnover times) doubles the fine-root contribution to forest NPP (9-13%) and supports the 50% root-to-soil transfer rate often used in models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-430
Number of pages11
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume199
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation0919276

    Keywords

    • C
    • Fine roots
    • Free-air CO enrichment (FACE)
    • Liquidambar styraciflua
    • Post-carboxylation fractionation
    • Root respiration
    • Root turnover
    • Stored carbon (C)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Stored carbon partly fuels fine-root respiration but is not used for production of new fine roots'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this