Spatial and seasonal variability of photosynthetic parameters and their relationship to leaf nitrogen in a deciduous forest

Kell B. Wilson, Dennis D. Baldocchi, Paul J. Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

338 Scopus citations

Abstract

We used gas exchange techniques to estimate maximum rate of carboxylation (V(cmax)), a measure of photosynthetic capacity, in the understory and upper crown of a closed deciduous forest over two seasons. There was extensive variability in photosynthetic capacity as a result of vertical canopy position, species type, leaf age and drought. Photosynthetic capacity was greater in oaks than in maples and greater in the overstory than in the understory. Parameter V(cmax) was maximal early in the season but declined slowly throughout most of the summer, and then more rapidly during senescence. There was also an apparent decline during drought in some trees. Variability in V(cmax) as a result of species or vertical canopy gradients was described well by changes in leaf nitrogen per unit area (N(a)). However, temporal changes in V(cmax) were often poorly correlated with leaf nitrogen, especially in spring and summer and during drought. This poor correlation may be the result of a seasonally dependent fractional allocation of leaf nitrogen to Rubisco; however, we could not discount Rubisco inactivation, patchy stomatal closure or changes in mesophyll resistance. Consequently, when a single annual regression equation of V(cmax) versus N(a) was used for this site, there were substantial errors in the temporal patterns in V(cmax) that will inevitably result in modeling errors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-578
Number of pages14
JournalTree Physiology
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2000

Keywords

  • A/C(i) curve
  • Drought
  • Gas exchange
  • Leaf age
  • Maple
  • Oak

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial and seasonal variability of photosynthetic parameters and their relationship to leaf nitrogen in a deciduous forest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this