Some elements for a revision of the americium reference biokinetic model

Eric Blanchardon, R. W. Leggett, K. F. Eckerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The interpretation of individual activity measurement after a contamination by 241Am or its parent nuclide 241Pu is based on the reference americium (Am) biokinetic model published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in 1993 [International Commission on Radiological Protection. Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 2 Ingestion dose coefficients. ICRP Publication 67. Ann. ICRP 23(3/4) (1993)]. The authors analysed the new data about Am biokinetics reported afterwards to propose an update of the current model. The most interesting results, from the United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries post-mortem measurement database [Filipy, R. E. and Russel, J. J. The United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries as sources for actinide dosimetry and bioeffects. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105(1-4), 185-187 (2003)] and the long-term follow-up of cases of inhalation intake [Malátová, I., Foltánová, Š., Becková, V., Filgas, R., Pospíšilová, H. and Hölgye, Z. Assessment of occupational doses from internal contamination with 241Am. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105(1-4), 325-328 (2003)], seemed to show that the current model underestimates the retention in the massive soft tissues and overestimates the retention in the skeleton and the late urinary excretion. However, a critical review of the data demonstrated that all were not equally reliable and suggested that only a slight revision of the model, possibly involving a change in the balance of activity between massive soft tissues, cortical and trabecular bone surfaces, may be required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-135
Number of pages5
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume127
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some elements for a revision of the americium reference biokinetic model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this