Solubility parameters and the distribution of ions to nonaqueous solvents

Charles F. Baes, Bruce A. Moyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Provided a singly charged, spherically symmetrical ion has a radius greater than ca. 0.2 nm, its distribution to a nonaqueous solvent from water can be accounted for by assigning to it a Hildebrand solubility parameter estimated for an uncharged atom or molecule, regardless of the model assumed for the Gibbs energy of charging the ion - that of Born, Abraham, and Liszi (J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1978, 74, 1604, 2858) or Abe (J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 713) - in the nonaqueous phase. For smaller ions, however, no choice of solubility parameter or ion size can alone account for their extractability. The extensive data available for the Gibbs energy of transfer of monovalent ions from water to a variety of solvents can be accounted for by assigning to the ion, in addition to a plausible solubility parameter, an effective radius rs = (r3i + Δr3s)1/3, wherein ri is the radius of the ion and Δrs is an adjustable distance characteristic of the solvent. Separate sets of Δrs values are needed for cations and anions. While the alternative models for charging the ion all give acceptable fits to the data, the shell model of Abraham and Liszi was selected as the most appropriate. The distance Δrs can be predicted for cations from the molar volume of the solvent and its hydrogen-bond acceptance index β. For anions, Δrs can be predicted from the molar volume and the hydrogen-bond donation index α. On the basis of these correlations, expressions are derived for predicting the extractability of a singly charged, approximately spherical ion and its activity coefficient in the nonaqueous phase.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6566-6574
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry B
Volume101
Issue number33
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Solubility parameters and the distribution of ions to nonaqueous solvents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this