TY - JOUR
T1 - Solubility parameters and the distribution of ions to nonaqueous solvents
AU - Baes, Charles F.
AU - Moyer, Bruce A.
PY - 1997/8/14
Y1 - 1997/8/14
N2 - Provided a singly charged, spherically symmetrical ion has a radius greater than ca. 0.2 nm, its distribution to a nonaqueous solvent from water can be accounted for by assigning to it a Hildebrand solubility parameter estimated for an uncharged atom or molecule, regardless of the model assumed for the Gibbs energy of charging the ion - that of Born, Abraham, and Liszi (J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1978, 74, 1604, 2858) or Abe (J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 713) - in the nonaqueous phase. For smaller ions, however, no choice of solubility parameter or ion size can alone account for their extractability. The extensive data available for the Gibbs energy of transfer of monovalent ions from water to a variety of solvents can be accounted for by assigning to the ion, in addition to a plausible solubility parameter, an effective radius rs = (r3i + Δr3s)1/3, wherein ri is the radius of the ion and Δrs is an adjustable distance characteristic of the solvent. Separate sets of Δrs values are needed for cations and anions. While the alternative models for charging the ion all give acceptable fits to the data, the shell model of Abraham and Liszi was selected as the most appropriate. The distance Δrs can be predicted for cations from the molar volume of the solvent and its hydrogen-bond acceptance index β. For anions, Δrs can be predicted from the molar volume and the hydrogen-bond donation index α. On the basis of these correlations, expressions are derived for predicting the extractability of a singly charged, approximately spherical ion and its activity coefficient in the nonaqueous phase.
AB - Provided a singly charged, spherically symmetrical ion has a radius greater than ca. 0.2 nm, its distribution to a nonaqueous solvent from water can be accounted for by assigning to it a Hildebrand solubility parameter estimated for an uncharged atom or molecule, regardless of the model assumed for the Gibbs energy of charging the ion - that of Born, Abraham, and Liszi (J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1978, 74, 1604, 2858) or Abe (J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 713) - in the nonaqueous phase. For smaller ions, however, no choice of solubility parameter or ion size can alone account for their extractability. The extensive data available for the Gibbs energy of transfer of monovalent ions from water to a variety of solvents can be accounted for by assigning to the ion, in addition to a plausible solubility parameter, an effective radius rs = (r3i + Δr3s)1/3, wherein ri is the radius of the ion and Δrs is an adjustable distance characteristic of the solvent. Separate sets of Δrs values are needed for cations and anions. While the alternative models for charging the ion all give acceptable fits to the data, the shell model of Abraham and Liszi was selected as the most appropriate. The distance Δrs can be predicted for cations from the molar volume of the solvent and its hydrogen-bond acceptance index β. For anions, Δrs can be predicted from the molar volume and the hydrogen-bond donation index α. On the basis of these correlations, expressions are derived for predicting the extractability of a singly charged, approximately spherical ion and its activity coefficient in the nonaqueous phase.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031210557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/jp9710547
DO - 10.1021/jp9710547
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031210557
SN - 1520-6106
VL - 101
SP - 6566
EP - 6574
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry B
IS - 33
ER -