Abstract
Managing soils to increase organic carbon storage presents a potential opportunity to mitigate and adapt to global change challenges, while providing numerous co-benefits and ecosystem services. However, soils differ widely in their potential for carbon sequestration, and knowledge of biophysical limits to carbon accumulation may aid in informing priority regions. Consequently, there is great interest in assessing whether soils exhibit a maximum capacity for storing organic carbon, particularly within organo–mineral associations given the finite nature of reactive minerals in a soil. While the concept of soil carbon saturation has existed for over 25 years, recent studies have argued for and against its importance. Here, we summarize the conceptual understanding of soil carbon saturation at both micro- and macro-scales, define key terminology, and address common concerns and misconceptions. We review methods used to quantify soil carbon saturation, highlighting the theory and potential caveats of each approach. Critically, we explore the utility of the principles of soil carbon saturation for informing carbon accumulation, vulnerability to loss, and representations in process-based models. We highlight key knowledge gaps and propose next steps for furthering our mechanistic understanding of soil carbon saturation and its implications for soil management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70197 |
| Journal | Global Change Biology |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2025 |
Funding
Funding: This work was supported by DOE Award SCW1632, LLNL-LDRD Program Project No. 22-ERD-021 and 24-SI-002, ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science SFA, Bavaria California Technology Center (BaCaTeC) Project No. 8 [2021-2], King Philanthropies, Arcadia Fund, USDA-NIFA 2020-67019-3139, and NSF 2409246. We thank Rota Wagai and one anonymous reviewer for constructive feedback that helped improve this manuscript. This review also greatly benefited from discussions with several colleagues, including Sebastian Villarino, Sophie von Fromm, Noah Sokol, and Eric Slessarev. K.G. was supported by the LLNL-LDRD Program under Project No. 22-ERD-021 and 24-SI-002 and DOE Award SCW1632, under the auspices of DOE Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. M.E.C. was supported by the ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science, Science Focus Area funded by the U.S. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle LLC for the DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. S.A.S. was supported by the Bavaria California Technology Center (BaCaTeC) under Project No. 8 [2021-2]. J.M.L. was supported by awards from King Philanthropies and Arcadia, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, to the Environmental Defense Fund. W.R.W. acknowledges USDA-NIFA 2020-67019-3139 and NSF 2409246. This material is based upon work supported by the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977. This work was supported by DOE Award SCW1632, LLNL‐LDRD Program Project No. 22‐ERD‐021 and 24‐SI‐002, ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science SFA, Bavaria California Technology Center (BaCaTeC) Project No. 8 [2021‐2], King Philanthropies, Arcadia Fund, USDA‐NIFA 2020‐67019‐3139, and NSF 2409246. Funding: We thank Rota Wagai and one anonymous reviewer for constructive feedback that helped improve this manuscript. This review also greatly benefited from discussions with several colleagues, including Sebastian Villarino, Sophie von Fromm, Noah Sokol, and Eric Slessarev. K.G. was supported by the LLNL‐LDRD Program under Project No. 22‐ERD‐021 and 24‐SI‐002 and DOE Award SCW1632, under the auspices of DOE Contract DE‐AC52‐07NA27344. M.E.C. was supported by the ORNL Terrestrial Ecosystem Science, Science Focus Area funded by the U.S. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research. ORNL is managed by UT‐Battelle LLC for the DOE under contract DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. S.A.S. was supported by the Bavaria California Technology Center (BaCaTeC) under Project No. 8 [2021‐2]. J.M.L. was supported by awards from King Philanthropies and Arcadia, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, to the Environmental Defense Fund. W.R.W. acknowledges USDA‐NIFA 2020‐67019‐3139 and NSF 2409246. This material is based upon work supported by the NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977.
Keywords
- effective capacity
- mineral capacity
- mineral-associated organic carbon
- process-based models
- sequestration efficiency
- soil carbon saturation
- steady-state
- vulnerability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Soil Carbon Saturation: What Do We Really Know?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver