Abstract
This work explores the influence of blend composition, network architecture, and hydrogen bonding on the material properties of crosslinked epoxy networks, focusing on the glass transition temperature (Tg) and Young’s modulus (Y). We used coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to simulate varying compositions of stiff and flexible components in epoxy monomer blends with varying excess of curative. We find that, without hydrogen bonding, networks of any composition show a monotonically increasing Tg with decreasing excess curative, consistent with theory. In contrast, we find that when hydrogen bonding is introduced, the binary blend networks show significant enhancement in Tg for lightly crosslinked systems. This result contributes to an explanation of the anomalous Tg behavior observed experimentally in these systems. We further find that Y is generally enhanced by hydrogen bonds, especially below Tg, demonstrating that hydrogen bonding has a significant influence on mechanical properties and can allow access to other desirable dynamic behavior, especially self-healing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5268-5277 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Macromolecules |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 14 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 25 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
This work was supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories. This work was performed in part at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by the National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. This paper describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) or the U.S. Government.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Office of Science | |
National Nuclear Security Administration | DE-NA-0003525 |
Sandia National Laboratories | |
Laboratory Directed Research and Development |