Simulation of mineral dissolution at the pore scale with evolving fluid-solid interfaces: review of approaches and benchmark problem set

Sergi Molins, Cyprien Soulaine, Nikolaos I. Prasianakis, Aida Abbasi, Philippe Poncet, Anthony J.C. Ladd, Vitalii Starchenko, Sophie Roman, David Trebotich, Hamdi A. Tchelepi, Carl I. Steefel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

95 Scopus citations

Abstract

This manuscript presents a benchmark problem for the simulation of single-phase flow, reactive transport, and solid geometry evolution at the pore scale. The problem is organized in three parts that focus on specific aspects: flow and reactive transport (part I), dissolution-driven geometry evolution in two dimensions (part II), and an experimental validation of three-dimensional dissolution-driven geometry evolution (part III). Five codes are used to obtain the solution to this benchmark problem, including Chombo-Crunch, OpenFOAM-DBS, a lattice Boltzman code, Vortex, and dissolFoam. These codes cover a good portion of the wide range of approaches typically employed for solving pore-scale problems in the literature, including discretization methods, characterization of the fluid-solid interfaces, and methods to move these interfaces as a result of fluid-solid reactions. A short review of these approaches is given in relation to selected published studies. Results from the simulations performed by the five codes show remarkable agreement both quantitatively—based on upscaled parameters such as surface area, solid volume, and effective reaction rate—and qualitatively—based on comparisons of shape evolution. This outcome is especially notable given the disparity of approaches used by the codes. Therefore, these results establish a strong benchmark for the validation and testing of pore-scale codes developed for the simulation of flow and reactive transport with evolving geometries. They also underscore the significant advances seen in the last decade in tools and approaches for simulating this type of problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1285-1318
Number of pages34
JournalComputational Geosciences
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Funding

This material is based upon work supported as part of the Center for Nanoscale Control of Geologic CO, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under award DE-AC02-05CH11231. Chombo-Crunch simulations used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. Development of dissolFoam was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division under Award Number DE-FG02-98ER14853 and DE-SC0018676. Development of the advanced mesh relaxation in dissolFoam was sponsored by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy. Vortex method simulations acknowledge the HPC resources of cluster Pyrene (UPPA-E2S, Pau, France) and the support of the Carnot Institute ISIFoR under contract RugoRX. N.I.P. acknowledges support from Swiss National Science Foundation, SNSF project No: 200021_172618, and the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS). The benchmark problem set was proposed and developed by S.M. and C.S. Manuscript preparation was led by S.M. Chombo-Crunch simulations were conducted by S.M., OpenFOAM-DBS by C.S., lattice Boltzmann by A.A. and N.I.P., vortex by P.P., and dissolFoam by A.L. and V.S. These authors are listed according to when they joined the benchmark effort. Chombo-Crunch was developed by D.T. and S.M., CrunchFlow by C.I.S., OpenFOAM-DBS by C.S., the lattice Boltzmann code by N.I.P., the vortex code by P.P., and dissolFoam by A.L. and V.S. Part III experiments were conducted by S.R. 2

FundersFunder number
Carnot Institute ISIFoR
Swiss National Supercomputing Centre
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science
Basic Energy SciencesDE-AC02-05CH11231
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences DivisionDE-FG02-98ER14853, DE-SC0018676
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung200021_172618

    Keywords

    • Benchmark
    • Moving boundary
    • Pore scale
    • Reactive transport
    • Review of approaches

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Simulation of mineral dissolution at the pore scale with evolving fluid-solid interfaces: review of approaches and benchmark problem set'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this