Simulated projections of boreal forest peatland ecosystem productivity are sensitive to observed seasonality in leaf physiology

Anna M. Jensen, Jeffrey M. Warren, Anthony W. King, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Paul J. Hanson, Stan D. Wullschleger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

We quantified seasonal CO2 assimilation capacities for seven dominant vascular species in a wet boreal forest peatland then applied data to a land surface model parametrized to the site (ELM-SPRUCE) to test if seasonality in photosynthetic parameters results in differences in simulated plant responses to elevated CO2 and temperature. We collected seasonal leaf-level gas exchange, nutrient content and stand allometric data from the field-layer community (i.e., Maianthemum trifolium (L.) Sloboda), understory shrubs (Rhododendron groenlandicum (Oeder) Kron and Judd, Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench., Kalmia polifolia Wangenh. and Vaccinium angustifolium Alton.) and overstory trees (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. and Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch). We found significant interspecific seasonal differences in specific leaf area, nitrogen content (by area; Na) and photosynthetic parameters (i.e., maximum rates of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax25°C), electron transport (Jmax25°C) and dark respiration (Rd25°C)), but minimal correlation between foliar Na and Vcmax25°C, Jmax25°C or Rd25°C, which illustrates that nitrogen alone is not a good correlate for physiological processes such as Rubisco activity that can change seasonally in this system. ELM-SPRUCE was sensitive to the introduction of observed interspecific seasonality in Vcmax25°C, Jmax25°C and Rd25°C, leading to simulated enhancement of net primary production (NPP) using seasonally dynamic parameters as compared with use of static parameters. This pattern was particularly pronounced under simulations with higher temperature and elevated CO2, suggesting a key hypothesis to address with future empirical or observational studies as climate changes. Inclusion of species-specific seasonal photosynthetic parameters should improve estimates of boreal ecosystem-level NPP, especially if impacts of seasonal physiological ontogeny can be separated from seasonal thermal acclimation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-572
Number of pages17
JournalTree Physiology
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Funding

†Note: This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

FundersFunder number
Biological and Environmental Research program
U.S. Department of EnergyDEAC05-00OR22725
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science

    Keywords

    • Boreal forest
    • Climate change
    • ELM
    • NPP
    • Peatland
    • R
    • SPRUCE
    • Seasonality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Simulated projections of boreal forest peatland ecosystem productivity are sensitive to observed seasonality in leaf physiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this