TY - GEN
T1 - Shock wave interaction with boundary layer at ramp surface
AU - Povitsky, Alex
AU - Miller, James H.
AU - Barua, Himel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The supersonic flow of cold air of 64 K with Mach=5.85 over a 2-D ramp of 16 degrees is modeled numerically assuming laminar, transitional and turbulent boundary layer models. Finite-volume approach and ANSYS/FLUENT software were used. The unitless surface pressure coefficients were obtained computationally and compared to surface pressures obtained by AFRL experiments for upstream and downstream surfaces with respect to the ramp corner. Generation of the numerical grid capturing the influence of the shock wave-associated pressure jump on the boundary layer is discussed. The 5-equations Reynolds Stresses turbulence model and 4-eq transitional model are believed to be the most accurate. The size of the upstream zone of influence is obtained in terms of surface pressure coefficient. The effects of ramp wall temperature on the wall friction coefficient are evaluated and found to be minor. Comparison with experimental data in terms of pressure coefficient shows that the turbulent flow model is applicable for total pressure P=1400 psi while the laminar flow model is more applicable to capture upstream surface pressure coefficient for P=700 psi.
AB - The supersonic flow of cold air of 64 K with Mach=5.85 over a 2-D ramp of 16 degrees is modeled numerically assuming laminar, transitional and turbulent boundary layer models. Finite-volume approach and ANSYS/FLUENT software were used. The unitless surface pressure coefficients were obtained computationally and compared to surface pressures obtained by AFRL experiments for upstream and downstream surfaces with respect to the ramp corner. Generation of the numerical grid capturing the influence of the shock wave-associated pressure jump on the boundary layer is discussed. The 5-equations Reynolds Stresses turbulence model and 4-eq transitional model are believed to be the most accurate. The size of the upstream zone of influence is obtained in terms of surface pressure coefficient. The effects of ramp wall temperature on the wall friction coefficient are evaluated and found to be minor. Comparison with experimental data in terms of pressure coefficient shows that the turbulent flow model is applicable for total pressure P=1400 psi while the laminar flow model is more applicable to capture upstream surface pressure coefficient for P=700 psi.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100296057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85100296057
SN - 9781624106095
T3 - AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
SP - 1
EP - 11
BT - AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2021
Y2 - 11 January 2021 through 15 January 2021
ER -