Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations

P. J. Hanson, N. T. Edwards, C. T. Garten, J. A. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1815 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forest soil respiration is the sum of heterotrophic (microbes, soil fauna) and autotrophic (root) respiration. The contribution of each group needs to be understood to evaluate implications of environmental change on soil carbon cycling and sequestration. Three primary methods have been used to distinguish hetero- versus autotrophic soil respiration including: integration of components contributing to in situ forest soil CO2 efflux (i.e., litter, roots, soil), comparison of soils with and without root exclusion, and application of stable or radioactive isotope methods. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, but isotope based methods provide quantitative answers with the least amount of disturbance to the soil and roots. Published data from all methods indicate that root/rhizosphere respiration can account for as little as 10 percent to greater than 90 percent of total in situ soil respiration depending on vegetation type and season of the year. Studies which have integrated percent root contribution to total soil respiration throughout an entire year or growing season show mean values of 45.8 and 60.4 percent for forest and nonforest vegetation, respectively. Such average annual values must be extrapolated with caution, however, because the root contribution to total soil respiration is commonly higher during the growing season and lower during the dormant periods of the year.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-146
Number of pages32
JournalBiogeochemistry
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Rhizosphere
  • Root respiration
  • Soil CO efflux
  • Soil respiration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this