TY - GEN
T1 - Sealed attics exposed to two years of weathering in a hot and humid climate
AU - Miller, William
AU - Shiao, Ming
AU - Railkar, Sudhir
AU - Desjarlais, Andre
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 U.S. Government.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Field studies in a hot, humid climate were conducted to investigate the thermal and hygrothermal performance of ventilated attics and nonventilated semi-conditioned attics sealed with open-cell and with closed-cell spray polyurethane foam insulation. In the ventilated attics the relative humidity drops as the attic air warms; however, the opposite was observed in the sealed attics. Peaks in measured relative humidity in excess of 80%–90% and occasionally near saturation (i.e., 100%) were observed from roughly solar noon till about 8 p.m. on hot, humid days. The conditioned space of the test facility is heated and cooled by an air-to-air heat pump. The space was not occupied and had no interior moisture load due to occupancy. Moisture pin measurements made in the sheathing and absolute humidity sensor data from inside the foam and from the attic air show that moisture is being stored in the foam and the roof sheathing. The moisture in the foam diffuses to and from the sheathing dependent on the pressure gradient at the foam-sheathing interface, which is driven by the irradiance and night-sky radiation. Ventilated attics in the same hot, humid climate showed less moisture movement in the sheathing than those sealed with either open- or closed-cell spray foam. The temperature measured on the underside of the sheathing was 10°C cooler (north-facing roof deck) and 20°C cooler (south-facing roof deck) for the ventilated attic as compared to the sheathing temperatures in the sealed attics. Foam was physically removed and moisture was observed around the rafter and sheathing interface. Observations, sheathing temperature, and partial pressure measurements suggest two-dimensional heat and moisture flow that is cyclic moving in and out of the depth of the roof and that also moves along the plane of the sheathing towards the rafters. The use of permeable spray foam in a hot, humid climate inadvertently allows moisture to be held against the roof deck. The moisture transfers back to the attic air as solar irradiance bears down on the roof.
AB - Field studies in a hot, humid climate were conducted to investigate the thermal and hygrothermal performance of ventilated attics and nonventilated semi-conditioned attics sealed with open-cell and with closed-cell spray polyurethane foam insulation. In the ventilated attics the relative humidity drops as the attic air warms; however, the opposite was observed in the sealed attics. Peaks in measured relative humidity in excess of 80%–90% and occasionally near saturation (i.e., 100%) were observed from roughly solar noon till about 8 p.m. on hot, humid days. The conditioned space of the test facility is heated and cooled by an air-to-air heat pump. The space was not occupied and had no interior moisture load due to occupancy. Moisture pin measurements made in the sheathing and absolute humidity sensor data from inside the foam and from the attic air show that moisture is being stored in the foam and the roof sheathing. The moisture in the foam diffuses to and from the sheathing dependent on the pressure gradient at the foam-sheathing interface, which is driven by the irradiance and night-sky radiation. Ventilated attics in the same hot, humid climate showed less moisture movement in the sheathing than those sealed with either open- or closed-cell spray foam. The temperature measured on the underside of the sheathing was 10°C cooler (north-facing roof deck) and 20°C cooler (south-facing roof deck) for the ventilated attic as compared to the sheathing temperatures in the sealed attics. Foam was physically removed and moisture was observed around the rafter and sheathing interface. Observations, sheathing temperature, and partial pressure measurements suggest two-dimensional heat and moisture flow that is cyclic moving in and out of the depth of the roof and that also moves along the plane of the sheathing towards the rafters. The use of permeable spray foam in a hot, humid climate inadvertently allows moisture to be held against the roof deck. The moisture transfers back to the attic air as solar irradiance bears down on the roof.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006327000&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85006327000
SN - 9781939200501
T3 - Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings
SP - 290
EP - 304
BT - Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings - XIII International Conference
PB - American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
T2 - 13th International Conference on Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings 2016
Y2 - 4 December 2016 through 8 December 2016
ER -