Abstract
Semicrystalline polymers are an attractive feedstock choice for material extrusion (MatEx)-based three-dimensional printing processes. However, the printed parts often exhibit poor mechanical properties due to weak interlayer strength thereby limiting the widespread adoption of MatEx. Improved interlayer strength in the printed parts can be achieved through a combination of process parameter selection and material modification but a physics-based understanding of the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Furthermore, the localized thermal history experienced by the prints can significantly influence the strength of the interlayer welds. In this work, a combined experimental and modeling approach has been employed to highlight the relative impact of rheology, non-isothermal crystallization kinetics, and print geometry on the interlayer strength of printed parts of two semicrystalline polymers, namely, polylactic acid (PLA) and polypropylene (PP). Specifically, the print properties have been characterized as a function of print temperature and print speed. In the case of single road width wall (SRWW) PLA prints, the total crystalline fraction increases due to the broadening of the crystallization window at higher print temperatures and lower print speeds. The results are substantiated by the constitutive modeling results that account for the effects of quiescent crystallization. However, SRWW PP prints display a reduction in the interlayer properties with temperature likely due to significant flow-induced crystallization effects, as suggested by the model. Interestingly, in the case of multilayer PP prints, the repeated heating/cooling cycles encountered during printing counteracts the flow-induced effects leading to an increase in mechanical properties with print temperature consistent with SRWW PLA prints.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 123108 |
Journal | Physics of Fluids |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Funding
The authors acknowledge the Macromolecules Innovation Institute (MII) at Virginia Tech (VT) for providing a collaborative infrastructure focused across the spectrum of polymer science and engineering research. The first author acknowledges funding from Adhesive Manufacturers Association Adhesive and Sealant Science scholarship through MII at VT.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Adhesive Manufacturers Association |