Abstract
The addition of phase change materials (PCMs) has been proposed as a means to mitigate thermal cracking in cementitious materials. However, the addition of PCMs, i.e., soft inclusions, degrades the compressive strength of cementitious composites. From a strength-of-materials viewpoint, such reductions in strength are suspected to increase the tendency of cementitious materials containing PCMs to crack under load (e.g., volume instability-induced stresses resulting from thermal and/or hygral deformations). Based on detailed assessments of free and restrained shrinkage, elastic modulus, and tensile strength, this study shows that the addition of PCMs does not alter the cracking sensitivity of the material. In fact, the addition of PCMs (or other soft inclusions) enhances the cracking resistance as compared to a plain cement paste or composites containing equivalent dosages of (stiff) quartz inclusions. This is because composites containing soft inclusions demonstrate benefits resulting from crack blunting and deflection, and improved stress relaxation. As a result, although the tensile stress at failure remains similar, the time to failure (i.e., macroscopic cracking) of PCM-containing composites is considerably extended. More generally, the outcomes indicate that dosages of soft(er) inclusions, and the resulting decrease in compressive strength does not amplify the cracking risk of cementitious composites.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 367-374 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Materials and Design |
| Volume | 132 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 15 2017 |
Funding
The authors acknowledge financial support for this research provisioned by: Infravation ERA-NET grant (ECLIPS: 31109806.0001), Department of Energy (DE-NE0008398), National Science Foundation (CMMI: 1130028, CAREER: 1253269) and the California Energy Commission (CEC Contract: PIR: 12-032). The authors also acknowledge discretionary financial support provided by the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research at UCLA via the ‘Sustainable L.A. Grand Challenge’. The contents of this paper reflect the views and opinions of the authors who are responsible for the accuracy of data presented. This research was carried out in the Laboratory for the Chemistry of Construction Materials (LC2) and Molecular Instrumentation Center at UCLA. As such, the authors gratefully acknowledge the support that has made these laboratories and their operations possible.
Keywords
- Composites
- Cracking
- Elastic modulus
- Inclusions
- Strength