Response patterns of simulated corn yield and soil nitrous oxide emission to precipitation change

Navneet Kaur, Dafeng Hui, Daniel M. Riccuito, Melanie A. Mayes, Hanqin Tian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Precipitation plays an important role in crop production and soil greenhouse gas emissions. However, how crop yield and soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emission respond to precipitation change, particularly with different background precipitations (dry, normal, and wet years), has not been well investigated. In this study, we examined the impacts of precipitation changes on corn yield and soil N2O emission using a long-term (1981–2020, 40 years) climate dataset as well as seven manipulated precipitation treatments with different background precipitations using the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) model. Results: Results showed large variations of corn yield and precipitation but small variation of soil N2O emission among 40 years. Both corn yield and soil N2O emission showed near linear relationships with precipitation based on the long-term precipitation data, but with different response patters of corn yield and soil N2O emission to precipitation manipulations. Corn yield showed a positive linear response to precipitation manipulations in the dry year, but no response to increases in precipitation in the normal year, and a trend of decrease in the wet year. The extreme drought treatments reduced corn yield sharply in both normal and wet years. In contrast, soil N2O emission mostly responded linearly to precipitation manipulations. Decreases in precipitation in the dry year reduced more soil N2O emission than those in the normal and wet years, while increases in precipitation increased more soil N2O emission in the normal and wet years than in the dry year. Conclusions: This study revealed different response patterns of corn yield and soil N2O emission to precipitation and highlights that mitigation strategy for soil N2O emission reduction should consider different background climate conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
JournalEcological Processes
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Funding

This research was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) RDPP project, National Science Foundation (NSF) MRI and EiR projects, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) projects, and Tennessee State University (TSU) RSP Seed grant. MAM was financially supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Scientific Focus Area at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. DOE. We thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE) RDPP project, National Science Foundation (NSF) MRI and EiR projects, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) projects, and Tennessee State University (TSU) RSP Seed Grant. MAM was financially supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Scientific Focus Area at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).

Keywords

  • Background precipitation
  • DNDC model
  • Precipitation change
  • Response pattern
  • Soil NO emission
  • Yield

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response patterns of simulated corn yield and soil nitrous oxide emission to precipitation change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this