Report on UQ Assessments to support SESAME wire-wrapped bundle experiment

This work assesses the influence of assumptions made when generating a mesh of a wire-wrapped geometry. The contact region between a wire and its adjacent pin is commonly modeled by either embedding the wire to the adjacent pin or trimming the wire so that a gap separates the wire from its adjacent pin. These models are referred to as close-gap and open-gap approaches herein and are applied to two geometries. The first geometry consists of a single pin wire-wrapped subchannel. A polyhedral mesh and a hexahedral mesh are generated. The second and third geometry are a 7-pin and a 19-pinwire-wrapped bundles meshed with polyhedral elements only. Pressure drops are obtained with the STAR-CCM+computational fluid dynamic package. Sensitivity analyses of the mesh density, the mesh type, and the turbulent models are performed. Numerical results show that the best match to the experimental data and to the Cheng-Todreas correlation is obtained with the combination of a hexahedral mesh, the shear stress transport (SST) turbulent model, and the open-gap approach. In the case of the 7-pin geometry, the best results are obtained with the open-gap approach and the SST turbulent model. The 19-pin geometry yields contradictory results to the 7-pin geometry results, and thus will require further investigations.