Reply to Comment on ‘The advanced tokamak path to a compact net electric fusion pilot plant’

R. J. Buttery; J. M. Park; J. T. McClenaghan; D. B. Weisberg; J. Canik; J. Ferron; A. M. Garofalo; C. T. Holcomb; J. A. Leuer; P. B. Snyder

doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d

Reply to Comment on ‘The advanced tokamak path to a compact net electric fusion pilot plant’

R. J. Buttery, J. M. Park, J. T. McClenaghan, D. B. Weisberg, J. Canik, J. Ferron, A. M. Garofalo, C. T. Holcomb, J. A. Leuer, P. B. Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Comment by Manheimer (submitted to Nucl. Fusion with this response) on our recent paper Buttery et al (2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 046028), has mischaracterized our paper with a series of misleading statements about its content, which it then seeks to refute. It also offers a series of assertions that are unsupported by refereed publication or scientific data—and sometimes in contradiction to the published record and well-established points in the scientific community. In this response we address the main thrusts and themes of the comment, while providing a point-by-point response in the appendix.

Original language	English
Article number	128002
Journal	Nuclear Fusion
Volume	62
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d
State	Published - Dec 1 2022

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, using the DIII-D National Fusion Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility, and partially funded under Awards DE-FC02-04ER54698, DE-FG02-95ER54309, DE-AC05-00OR22725 and DE-AC52-07NA27344, and the SCIDAC-4 Project under Grant DE-SC0017992.

Keywords

energy
fusion
pilot plant
steady state
tokamak

Access to Document

10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d

Cite this

@article{fdeebfbe45054acd9f818294a8d9a3e4,

title = "Reply to Comment on {\textquoteleft}The advanced tokamak path to a compact net electric fusion pilot plant{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "The Comment by Manheimer (submitted to Nucl. Fusion with this response) on our recent paper Buttery et al (2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 046028), has mischaracterized our paper with a series of misleading statements about its content, which it then seeks to refute. It also offers a series of assertions that are unsupported by refereed publication or scientific data—and sometimes in contradiction to the published record and well-established points in the scientific community. In this response we address the main thrusts and themes of the comment, while providing a point-by-point response in the appendix.",

keywords = "energy, fusion, pilot plant, steady state, tokamak",

author = "Buttery, \{R. J.\} and Park, \{J. M.\} and McClenaghan, \{J. T.\} and Weisberg, \{D. B.\} and J. Canik and J. Ferron and Garofalo, \{A. M.\} and Holcomb, \{C. T.\} and Leuer, \{J. A.\} and Snyder, \{P. B.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d",

language = "English",

volume = "62",

journal = "Nuclear Fusion",

issn = "0029-5515",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comment on ‘The advanced tokamak path to a compact net electric fusion pilot plant’

AU - Buttery, R. J.

AU - Park, J. M.

AU - McClenaghan, J. T.

AU - Weisberg, D. B.

AU - Canik, J.

AU - Ferron, J.

AU - Garofalo, A. M.

AU - Holcomb, C. T.

AU - Leuer, J. A.

AU - Snyder, P. B.

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - The Comment by Manheimer (submitted to Nucl. Fusion with this response) on our recent paper Buttery et al (2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 046028), has mischaracterized our paper with a series of misleading statements about its content, which it then seeks to refute. It also offers a series of assertions that are unsupported by refereed publication or scientific data—and sometimes in contradiction to the published record and well-established points in the scientific community. In this response we address the main thrusts and themes of the comment, while providing a point-by-point response in the appendix.

AB - The Comment by Manheimer (submitted to Nucl. Fusion with this response) on our recent paper Buttery et al (2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 046028), has mischaracterized our paper with a series of misleading statements about its content, which it then seeks to refute. It also offers a series of assertions that are unsupported by refereed publication or scientific data—and sometimes in contradiction to the published record and well-established points in the scientific community. In this response we address the main thrusts and themes of the comment, while providing a point-by-point response in the appendix.

KW - energy

KW - fusion

KW - pilot plant

KW - steady state

KW - tokamak

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85140035929

U2 - 10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d

DO - 10.1088/1741-4326/ac914d

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85140035929

SN - 0029-5515

VL - 62

JO - Nuclear Fusion

JF - Nuclear Fusion

IS - 12

M1 - 128002

ER -

Reply to Comment on ‘The advanced tokamak path to a compact net electric fusion pilot plant’

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this