Relative outcomes of climate change mitigation related to global temperature versus sea-level rise

Gerald A. Meehl, Aixue Hu, Claudia Tebaldi, Julie M. Arblaster, Warren M. Washington, Haiyan Teng, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Toby Ault, Warren G. Strand, James B. White

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is a common perception that, if human societies make the significant adjustments necessary to substantively cut emissions of greenhouse gases, global temperature increases could be stabilized, and the most dangerous consequences of climate change could be avoided. Here we show results from global coupled climate model simulations with the new representative concentration pathway mitigation scenarios to 2300 to illustrate that, with aggressive mitigation in two of the scenarios, globally averaged temperature increase indeed could be stabilized either below 2 A°C or near 3 A°C above pre-industrial values. However, even as temperatures stabilize, sea level would continue to rise. With little mitigation, future sea-level rise would be large and continue unabated for centuries. Though sea-level rise cannot be stopped for at least the next several hundred years, with aggressive mitigation it can be slowed down, and this would buy time for adaptation measures to be adopted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-580
Number of pages5
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relative outcomes of climate change mitigation related to global temperature versus sea-level rise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this