Redox Biocatalysis: Quantitative Comparisons of Nicotinamide Cofactor Regeneration Methods

Victor K. Sharma, Justin M. Hutchison, Alan M. Allgeier

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Enzymatic processes, particularly those capable of performing redox reactions, have recently been of growing research interest. Substrate specificity, optimal activity at mild temperatures, high selectivity, and yield are among the desirable characteristics of these oxidoreductase catalyzed reactions. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) or NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases have been extensively studied for their potential applications like biosynthesis of chiral organic compounds, construction of biosensors, and pollutant degradation. One of the main challenges associated with making these processes commercially viable is the regeneration of the expensive cofactors required by the enzymes. Numerous efforts have pursued enzymatic regeneration of NAD(P)H by coupling a substrate reduction with a complementary enzyme catalyzed oxidation of a co-substrate. While offering excellent selectivity and high total turnover numbers, such processes involve complicated downstream product separation of a primary product from the coproducts and impurities. Alternative methods comprising chemical, electrochemical, and photochemical regeneration have been developed with the goal of enhanced efficiency and operational simplicity compared to enzymatic regeneration. Despite the goal, however, the literature rarely offers a meaningful comparison of the total turnover numbers for various regeneration methodologies. This comprehensive Review systematically discusses various methods of NAD(P)H cofactor regeneration and quantitatively compares performance across the numerous methods. Further, fundamental barriers to enhanced cofactor regeneration in the various methods are identified, and future opportunities are highlighted for improving the efficiency and sustainability of commercially viable oxidoreductase processes for practical implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere202200888
JournalChemSusChem
Volume15
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 22 2022
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Kansas Corn Commission under award number 2205 and by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) under award number P20 GM113117 (JMH).

Keywords

  • biocatalysis
  • cofactor regeneration
  • electrocatalysis
  • oxidoreductases
  • photocatalysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Redox Biocatalysis: Quantitative Comparisons of Nicotinamide Cofactor Regeneration Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this