Reactivity of plutonium-containing glasses for the immobilization of surplus fissile materials

J. K. Bates, J. C. Hoh, J. W. Emery, E. C. Buck, J. A. Fortner, S. F. Wolf, T. R. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Experiments have been performed on glasses doped with 2 and 7 wt% plutonium to evaluate factors that may be important in the performance of these high-Pu-loaded glasses for repository storage. The high Pu loadings result from the need to dispose of excess Pu from weapons dismantling. The glasses were reacted in water vapor to simulate aging that may occur under unsaturated storage conditions prior to contact with liquid water. They were also reacted with liquid water under standard static leach test conditions. The results were compared with similar tests of a reference glass (202 glass) containing only 0.01 wt% Pu. In vapor hydration testing to date, at 2 wt% loading, the Pu was incorporated into the glass without phase separation, and reaction in water vapor proceeded at a rate comparable with that of the 202 glass. At 7 wt% loading, Pu was phase separated and was not uniformly incorporated into the glass. The vapor reaction of this glass proceeded at a more rapid rate. This phase separation was manifested in the static leach tests, where colloidal phases of Pu-rich material remained suspended in solution, thereby increasing the absolute Pu release when compared to the 202 glass.

Original languageEnglish
Pages588-593
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on High Level Radioactive Waste Management - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Duration: Apr 30 1995May 5 1995

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on High Level Radioactive Waste Management
CityLas Vegas, NV, USA
Period04/30/9505/5/95

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reactivity of plutonium-containing glasses for the immobilization of surplus fissile materials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this