Abstract
The differences between classical and quantum sources in the context of coincidence imaging are discussed. Consequently, a classical source must be configured to work with a particular reference geometry, whereas use of a quantum source allows the reference geometry to be chosen after the source is in place. It is shown how the fixed-basis limitation of a classical source can be compensated by a pair of lenses near the source, so that in practical terms a classical coincidence imaging setup will provide nearly the same flexibility as a quantum coincidence imaging setup.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | QMH2/1-QMH2/2 |
| State | Published - 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | Trends in Optics and Photonics Series: Quantum electronics and Laser Science (QELS) - Baltimore, MD., United States Duration: Jun 1 2003 → Jun 6 2003 |
Conference
| Conference | Trends in Optics and Photonics Series: Quantum electronics and Laser Science (QELS) |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Baltimore, MD. |
| Period | 06/1/03 → 06/6/03 |