Quantitative metrics for assessment of chemical image quality and spatial resolution

Vilmos Kertesz, John F. Cahill, Gary J. Van Berkel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale Currently objective/quantitative descriptions of the quality and spatial resolution of mass spectrometry derived chemical images are not standardized. Development of these standardized metrics is required to objectively describe the chemical imaging capabilities of existing and/or new mass spectrometry imaging technologies. Such metrics would allow unbiased judgment of intra-laboratory advancement and/or inter-laboratory comparison for these technologies if used together with standardized surfaces. Methods Two image metrics, viz., "chemical image contrast" (ChemIC) based on signal-to-noise related statistical measures on chemical image pixels and "corrected resolving power factor" (cRPF) constructed from statistical analysis of mass-to-charge chronograms across features of interest in an image, were developed. These metrics, quantifying chemical image quality and spatial resolution, respectively, were used to evaluate chemical images of a model photoresist patterned surface collected using a laser ablation/liquid vortex capture mass spectrometry imaging system under different instrument operational parameters. Results The calculated ChemIC and cRPF metrics determined in an unbiased fashion the relative ranking of chemical image quality obtained with the laser ablation/liquid vortex capture mass spectrometry imaging system. These rankings were used to show that both chemical image contrast and spatial resolution deteriorated with increasing surface scan speed, increased lane spacing and decreasing size of surface features. Conclusions ChemIC and cRPF, respectively, were developed and successfully applied for the objective description of chemical image quality and spatial resolution of chemical images collected from model surfaces using a laser ablation/liquid vortex capture mass spectrometry imaging system. Published in 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)927-932
Number of pages6
JournalRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2016

Funding

Leslie L. Wilson (ORNL) is thanked for preparing the photoresist coated substrates. The 5500 QTRAP mass spectrometer used to acquire the chemical images shown in this work was provided on loan by Sciex through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA NFE-10-02966). This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy. gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

FundersFunder number
DOE Public Access Plan
United States Government
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science
Basic Energy Sciences
Oak Ridge National LaboratoryCRADA NFE-10-02966
Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences DivisionDE-AC05-00OR22725

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative metrics for assessment of chemical image quality and spatial resolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this