Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative Cu counting methodologies for Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction catalysts by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy

  • Junhua Li
  • , Feng Gao
  • , Yani Zhang
  • , Yiqing Wu
  • , Yue Peng
  • , Eric D. Walter
  • , Ying Chen
  • , Nancy M. Washton
  • , Janos Szanyi
  • , Yong Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts with distinct Si/Al ratios and isolated Z2Cu and ZCuOH distributions are prepared for in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic studies. These in situ studies include dehydration, titration of dehydrated samples with NO+O2 and NH3, titration of NH3-saturated samples with NO+O2, and finally steady-state standard NH3-SCR reaction. During dehydration, EPR-active hydrated ZCuOH loses H2O ligands and becomes EPR-silent due to a pseudo Jahn−Teller effect; a portion of ZCuOH also undergoes autoreduction to ZCu(I) species, a process that also induces EPR invisibility. During NO+O2 treatment of dehydrated samples, ZCu(I) species are oxidized to Cu(II)−NO3 species, regaining EPR visibility. During NH3 titration, EPR-silent dehydrated ZCuOH can also regain EPR visibility by coordinating with NH3 ligands. During NO+O2 titration of NH3-saturated samples, EPR-active Cu contents first decrease due to Cu(II) reduction to Cu(I) and then increase due to Cu(II)− NO3 species formation. However, the Cu(II)−NO3 formation chemistry is substantially slower for the Si/Al = 36 catalyst. In steady-state SCR studies, the EPR-active content decreases with increasing temperature in the kinetically controlled low-temperature regime and becomes largely invariant in the mass transfer-limited regime. Importantly, Cu sites in the SCR more active Si/Al = 6 catalyst display substantially higher EPR visibility than the SCR less active Si/Al = 36 catalyst at any reaction temperatures tested. The higher Cu loading for the former catalyst is believed to be the key for this difference.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28061-28073
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry C
Volume124
Issue number51
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 24 2020

Funding

The authors from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) gratefully acknowledge the US Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office for the support of this work. The research described in this paper was performed in the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at PNNL. PNNL is operated for the US DOE by Battelle. The authors from Tsinghua University acknowledge the Natural National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 21936005), the national key research and development program of China (2017YFC0211102), and the Joint-Training Scholarship provided by the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for Yani Zhang's visit to PNNL. The authors are grateful to Dr. Charles H.F. (Chuck) Peden (PNNL) for his insightful comments and careful editing of the manuscript. The authors from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) gratefully acknowledge the US Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office for the support of this work. The research described in this paper was performed in the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at PNNL. PNNL is operated for the US DOE by Battelle. The authors from Tsinghua University acknowledge the Natural National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 21936005), the national key research and development program of China (2017YFC0211102), and the Joint-Training Scholarship provided by the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for Yani Zhang’s visit to PNNL. The authors are grateful to Dr. Charles H.F. (Chuck) Peden (PNNL) for his insightful comments and careful editing of the manuscript.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative Cu counting methodologies for Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction catalysts by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this