Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system

Kati Koponen, Sampo Soimakallio, Keith L. Kline, Annette Cowie, Miguel Brandão

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

In order to understand the climate effects of a bioenergy system, a comparison between the bioenergy system and a reference system is required. The reference system describes the situation that occurs in the absence of the bioenergy system with respect to the use of land, energy, and materials. The importance of reference systems is discussed in the literature but guidance on choosing suitable reference systems for assessing climate effects of bioenergy is limited. The reference system should align with the purpose of the study. Transparency of reference system assumptions is essential for proper interpretation of bioenergy assessments. This paper presents guidance for selecting suitable reference systems. Particular attention is given to choosing the land reference. If the goal is to study the climate effects of bioenergy as a part of total anthropogenic activity the reference system should illustrate what is expected in the absence of human activities. In such a case the suitable land reference is natural regeneration, and energy or material reference systems are not relevant. If the goal is to assess the effect of a change in bioenergy use, the reference system should incorporate human activities. In this case suitable reference systems describe the most likely alternative uses of the land, energy and materials in the absence of the change in bioenergy use. The definition of the reference system is furthermore subject to the temporal scope of the study. In practice, selecting and characterizing reference systems will involve various choices and uncertainties which should be considered carefully. It can be instructive to consider how alternative reference systems influence the results and conclusions drawn from bioenergy assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2271-2280
Number of pages10
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume81
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Funding

The authors acknowledge Leif Gustavsson from Linnaeus University for his valuable contribution and comments, and the IEA Bioenergy Task 38 for enabling the collaboration. KK acknowledges the funding from The Academy of Finland EES-doctoral school and ECOSUS project (decision no. 257174). SS acknowledges the BEST bioenergy programme and Maj and Tor Nessling foundation for financing. KLK acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the Bioenergy Technologies Office and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The authors acknowledge Leif Gustavsson from Linnaeus University for his valuable contribution and comments, and the IEA Bioenergy Task 38 for enabling the collaboration. KK acknowledges the funding from The Academy of Finland EES-doctoral school and ECOSUS project (decision no. 257174 ). SS acknowledges the BEST bioenergy programme and Maj and Tor Nessling foundation for financing. KLK acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the Bioenergy Technologies Office and Oak Ridge National Laboratory , managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 .

Keywords

  • Bioenergy
  • Climate effect
  • Land use
  • Reference system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy – Choice of reference system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this