Precipitation change and soil leaching: Field results and simulations from walker branch watershed, Tennessee

D. W. Johnson, P. J. Hanson, D. E. Todd, R. B. Susfalk, C. F. Trettin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

To investigate the potential effects of changing precipitation on a deciduous forest ecosystem, an experiment was established on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee that modified the amount of throughfall at -33%, ambient (no change), and +33% using a system of rain gutters and sprinklers. We hypothesized that the drier treatments would cause: 1) disproportionate changes in soil water flux, 2) increased total ionic concentrations in soil solution that would in turn cause 3) decreased SO42-/Cl- ratios, 4) decreased HCO3- concentrations, and 5) increased ratios of Al to (Ca2+ + Mg2+) and of(Ca2+ + Mg2+) to K+. Hypothesis 1 was supported by simulation results. Hypotheses 2 and 3 were supported in part by field results, although interpretation of these was complicated by pre-treatment biases. Hypotheses 4 and 5 were not supported by the field results. Comparisons of field data and Nutrient Cycling Model (NuCM) simulations were favorable for most ions except Cl- and K+. The disparities may be due to underestimation of soil buffering in the case of Cl- and overestimation of soil buffering in the case of K+ in the model. Long-term simulations with NuCM suggest that reducing water inputs will slow the rate of soil acidification and P loss, but will not materially affect growth or ecosystem N status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-262
Number of pages12
JournalWater, Air, & Soil Pollution
Volume105
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Keywords

  • Leaching
  • Nutrient Cycling Model
  • Rainfall
  • Soil solution chemistry
  • Walker Branch Watershed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Precipitation change and soil leaching: Field results and simulations from walker branch watershed, Tennessee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this