Abstract
Headwater streams are diverse ecosystems and important sources of water and dissolved and particulate resources to the downstream river network. However, across the world, they are rapidly being degraded or lost through human activities, particularly urban development. This degradation and loss have negative consequences for the structure and function of headwater streams, as well as downstream river networks. Despite long-held recognition of the ecological value of headwater streams and the impacts of their widespread loss, there remains a large gap between developing strategies and tangible action. To address this gap, we, a group of cross-disciplinary researchers and practitioners from multiple organizations and locations, developed a framework to guide strategic decision-making and a comprehensive set of structural and nonstructural tools that can be used to protect headwater streams in urbanizing areas where opportunities to protect waterway health are being considered by local waterway practitioners and the community. The framework was tested by applying it to 4 contrasting case studies of urbanization with different physiographic, policy, and legislative settings. Our evaluation showed that the framework provides a useful generic mechanism that can be used by policymakers, planners, and other stakeholders to diagnose the status of headwater stream protection in a variety of urban areas and to support structured stakeholder conversations about what is desirable, practical, and achievable for their context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 546-567 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Freshwater Science |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
This research was partially funded by Melbourne Water through the Melbourne Waterway Research-Practice Partnership. Melbourne Water sponsored SUSE6, including the headwater streams workshop. We would like to thank Katherine Abbott, Stephanie Amy, Samantha Colbran, Robert James, Peter Poelsma, Emily Taylor, Rephael Lankri, Mark Gardiner, Chris Walsh, and Maziar Korzani for their contributions to the workshop. We also thank Olivia Blair-Holt, Sharyn Rossrakesh, Amy Grayson, Joseph Holloway, Tim Fichera, Natalie Hall, Kristina Hopkins, Marina Metes, Eric Naibert, and Kenny Mack for their contributions to the framework-testing workshops. We also thank Stephanie Gordon, Thomas P. Suro, Megan Fork, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interest.