Post-build stress-relief optimization for laser powder bed fusion 316H stainless steel

Geeta Kumari, Tim Graening, Xuan Zang, Peeyush Nandwana, Selda Nayir, Stephen Taller, Chase Joslin, Amanda L. Musgrove, Amy Godfrey, Caleb Massey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nuclear energy remains a critical component of a diversified and efficient energy portfolio, offering reliable, high-capacity, and low-carbon power. However, in the U.S., aging infrastructure and the slow qualification and deployment of advanced materials and manufacturing techniques hinder progress in next-generation reactor technologies. This study explores the application of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing for stainless steel 316H, with a focus on optimizing post-build heat treatments to enhance material properties for high-temperature nuclear applications. The research targets the optimization of stress-relief temperatures to alleviate postbuild residual stresses, ensuring improvements in the microstructural corelated properties. A series of microstructural and mechanical evaluations were performed on LPBF-printed SS-316H samples which were subjected to annealing at temperatures varying between 650 °C and 850 °C. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy analyses revealed that increasing the heattreatment temperature accelerated dislocation recovery. Vickers microhardness measurements showed an initial reduction in values, followed by stabilization over extended durations at all the temperatures. While higher temperatures facilitated faster recovery, they also promoted carbide precipitation along grain and solidification cell boundaries, narrowing the safe processing window. In contrast, heat treatment at 650°C preserved the cellular substructure and enabled controlled carbide precipitation over time. These findings highlight the importance of time–temperature optimization and suggest that 650°C for up to 2 h provides the most favorable balance between recovery and carbide control for a stress-relief treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102520
JournalMaterialia
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Funding

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). This research was conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory under the funding of the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) - Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies (NEET) - Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) program. The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( https://www.energy.gov/doe-public-access-plan ). The authors would like to acknowledge Ryan Duncan for specimen machining, Kevin Hanson for heat-treatment, Jim Horenburg, and Sarah Graham for metallography. In addition, the authors also thank Dr. Alex Plotkowski and Dr. Sebastien Dryepondt for their technical review and input to prepare this manuscript.

Keywords

  • 316 stainless steel
  • Additive manufacturing
  • Electron microscopy
  • Heat treatment, Stress-relief
  • Laser powder bed fusion
  • X-ray diffraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-build stress-relief optimization for laser powder bed fusion 316H stainless steel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this