TY - JOUR
T1 - Physics of cuprates with the two-band Hubbard model
T2 - The validity of the one-band Hubbard model
AU - Macridin, A.
AU - Jarrell, M.
AU - Maier, Th
AU - Sawatzky, G. A.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - We calculate the properties of the two-band Hubbard model using the dynamical cluster approximation. The phase diagram resembles the generic phase diagram of the cuprates, showing a strong asymmetry with respect to electron- and hole-doped regimes, in agreement with experiment. Asymmetric features are also seen in one-particle spectral functions and in the charge, spin, and d -wave pairing-susceptibility functions. We address the possible reduction of the two-band model to a low-energy single-band one, as it was suggested by Zhang and Rice. Comparing the two-band Hubbard model properties with the single-band Hubbard model ones, we have found similar low-energy physics provided that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping term t′ has a significant value (t′ t≈0.3). The parameter t′ is the main culprit for the electron-hole asymmetry. However, a significant value of t′ cannot be provided in a strict Zhang and Rice [Phys. Rev. B 37, R3759 (1988); 41, 7243 (1990)] picture where the extra holes added into the system bind to the existing Cu holes forming local singlets. We note that by considering approximate singlet states, such as plaquette states, reasonable values of t′, which capture qualitatively the physics of the two-band model, can be obtained. We conclude that a single-band t- t′ -U Hubbard model captures the basic physics of the cuprates concerning superconductivity, antiferromagnetism, pseudogap, and electron-hole asymmetry, but is not suitable for a quantitative analysis or to describe physical properties involving energy scales larger than about 0.5 eV.
AB - We calculate the properties of the two-band Hubbard model using the dynamical cluster approximation. The phase diagram resembles the generic phase diagram of the cuprates, showing a strong asymmetry with respect to electron- and hole-doped regimes, in agreement with experiment. Asymmetric features are also seen in one-particle spectral functions and in the charge, spin, and d -wave pairing-susceptibility functions. We address the possible reduction of the two-band model to a low-energy single-band one, as it was suggested by Zhang and Rice. Comparing the two-band Hubbard model properties with the single-band Hubbard model ones, we have found similar low-energy physics provided that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping term t′ has a significant value (t′ t≈0.3). The parameter t′ is the main culprit for the electron-hole asymmetry. However, a significant value of t′ cannot be provided in a strict Zhang and Rice [Phys. Rev. B 37, R3759 (1988); 41, 7243 (1990)] picture where the extra holes added into the system bind to the existing Cu holes forming local singlets. We note that by considering approximate singlet states, such as plaquette states, reasonable values of t′, which capture qualitatively the physics of the two-band model, can be obtained. We conclude that a single-band t- t′ -U Hubbard model captures the basic physics of the cuprates concerning superconductivity, antiferromagnetism, pseudogap, and electron-hole asymmetry, but is not suitable for a quantitative analysis or to describe physical properties involving energy scales larger than about 0.5 eV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28744453908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134527
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134527
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:28744453908
SN - 1098-0121
VL - 71
JO - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
JF - Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
IS - 13
M1 - 134527
ER -