Physics of cuprates with the two-band Hubbard model: The validity of the one-band Hubbard model

A. Macridin, M. Jarrell, Th Maier, G. A. Sawatzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

We calculate the properties of the two-band Hubbard model using the dynamical cluster approximation. The phase diagram resembles the generic phase diagram of the cuprates, showing a strong asymmetry with respect to electron- and hole-doped regimes, in agreement with experiment. Asymmetric features are also seen in one-particle spectral functions and in the charge, spin, and d -wave pairing-susceptibility functions. We address the possible reduction of the two-band model to a low-energy single-band one, as it was suggested by Zhang and Rice. Comparing the two-band Hubbard model properties with the single-band Hubbard model ones, we have found similar low-energy physics provided that the next-nearest-neighbor hopping term t′ has a significant value (t′ t≈0.3). The parameter t′ is the main culprit for the electron-hole asymmetry. However, a significant value of t′ cannot be provided in a strict Zhang and Rice [Phys. Rev. B 37, R3759 (1988); 41, 7243 (1990)] picture where the extra holes added into the system bind to the existing Cu holes forming local singlets. We note that by considering approximate singlet states, such as plaquette states, reasonable values of t′, which capture qualitatively the physics of the two-band model, can be obtained. We conclude that a single-band t- t′ -U Hubbard model captures the basic physics of the cuprates concerning superconductivity, antiferromagnetism, pseudogap, and electron-hole asymmetry, but is not suitable for a quantitative analysis or to describe physical properties involving energy scales larger than about 0.5 eV.

Original languageEnglish
Article number134527
JournalPhysical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
Volume71
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physics of cuprates with the two-band Hubbard model: The validity of the one-band Hubbard model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this