Physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of soil-saprolite cores from a field research site, Tennessee

Ji Won Moon, Yul Roh, Tommy J. Phelps, Debra H. Phillips, David B. Watson, Young Jin Kim, Scott C. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Site characterization is an essential initial step in determining the feasibility of remedial alternatives at hazardous waste sites. Physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of U-contaminated soils in deeply weathered saprolite at Area 2 of the DOE Field Research Center (FRC) site, Oak Ridge, TN, was accomplished to examine the feasibility of bioremediation. Concentrations of U in soil-saprolite (up to 291 mg kg-1 in oxalate-extractable U o) were closely related to low pH (ca. 4-5), high effective cation exchange capacity without Ca (64.7-83.2 cmolc kg-1), amorphous Mn content (up to 9910 mg kg-1), and the decreased presence of relative clay mineral contents in the bulk samples (i.e., illite 2.5-12 wt. %, average 32 wt. %). The pH of the fill material ranged from 7.0 to 10.5, whereas the pH of the saprolite ranged from 4.5 to 8. Uranium concentration was highest (about 300 mg kg-1) at around 6 m below land surface near the saprolite-fill interface. The pH of ground water at Area 2 tended to be between 6 and 7 with U concentrations of about 0.9 to 1.7 mg L-1. These site specific characteristics of Area 2, which has lower U and nitrate contamination levels and more neutral ground water pH compared with FRC Areas 1 and 3 (ca. 5.5 and <4, respectively), indicate that with appropriate addition of electron donors and nutrients bioremediation of U by metal reducing microorganisms may be possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1731-1741
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of soil-saprolite cores from a field research site, Tennessee'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this