Abstract
In multicomponent Al-Ce alloys, and especially after additive manufacturing (AM), complex and metastable solidification microstructures are frequently observed. In this research, the relationship between solidification conditions and phase selection are explored for an Al-10Ce-8Mn (wt pct) alloy using a systematic study of laser melting conditions. Three solidification modes were observed: primary Al10Mn2Ce; primary Al20Mn2Ce; and eutectic FCC Al + Al20Mn2Ce. These solidification modes were correlated to specific liquid-solid interface velocities using a simple thermal model, showing the change in primary solidification phase for low (< 6.8 × 10−4 m/s), moderate (between 8.2 × 10−4 and 5.9 × 10−2 m/s) and high solidification velocities (> 6.2x10−2 m/s) for the above three solidification microstructures, respectively. These results were rationalized by using interface response function (IRF) theory to describe the solidification undercooling for the possible primary intermetallic phases. The implication of the local phase selection from differing solidification conditions is summarized by a comparison of hardness which demonstrates the potential variance of Vickers hardness from 101 to 242 (VHV) by changing the laser velocity from 1 to 83 mm/s. Interestingly, on heat treatment at 400 ∘C, the decomposition pathways of the solidification microstructure and hardness were also found to be different, thereby opening multiple pathways for spatial microstructure and property control within AM components.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Funding
This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan ( http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan ). This research was cosponsored by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, Powertrain Materials Core Program and by the DOE Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office Manufacturing Demonstration Facility at ORNL.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
U.S. Department of Energy | |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | |
DOE Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office Manufacturing Demonstration Facility | |
DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office |