Perspectives on Quenching and Tempering 4340 Steel

A. J. Clarke, J. Klemm-Toole, K. D. Clarke, D. R. Coughlin, D. T. Pierce, V. K. Euser, J. D. Poplawsky, B. Clausen, D. Brown, J. Almer, P. J. Gibbs, D. J. Alexander, R. D. Field, D. L. Williamson, J. G. Speer, G. Krauss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Steels are ubiquitous due to their affordability and the landscape of useful properties that can be generated for engineering applications. But to further expand the performance envelope, one must be able to understand and control microstructure development by alloying and processing. Here we use multiscale, advanced characterization to better understand the structural and chemical evolution of AISI 4340 steel after quenching and tempering (Q&T), including the role of quench rate and short-time, isothermal tempering below 573 K (300 °C), with an emphasis on carbide formation. We compare the microstructure and/or property changes produced by conventional tempering to those produced by higher temperature, short-time “rapid” tempering. We underscore that no single characterization technique can fully capture the subtle microstructure changes like carbon redistribution, transition carbide and/or cementite formation, and retained austenite decomposition that occur during Q&T. Only the use of multiple techniques begins to unravel these complexities. After controlled fast or slow quenching, η transition carbides clearly exist in the microstructure, likely associated with autotempering of this high martensite start temperature (Ms) steel. Isothermal tempering below 598 K (325 °C) results in the relief of carbon supersaturation in the martensite, primarily by the formation of η transition carbides that exhibit a range of carbon levels, seemingly without substitutional element partitioning between the carbide and matrix phases. Hägg transition carbide is present between 300 °C and 325 °C. After conventional tempering at or above 598 K (325 °C) for 2 h, cementite is predominant, but small amounts of cementite are also present in other conditions, even after quenching. Previous work has indicated that silicon (Si) and substitutional elements partition between the cementite, which initially forms under paraequilibrium conditions, and the matrix. Phosphorous (P) may also be preferentially located at cementite/matrix interfaces after high temperature tempering. Slower quench rates result in greater amounts of retained austenite compared to those after fast quenching, which we attribute to increased austenite stability resulting from “autopartitioning”. Rapid, high temperature tempering is also found to diminish tempered martensite embrittlement (TME) believed to be associated with the extent of austenite decomposition, resulting in mechanical properties not attainable by conventional tempering, which may have important implications with respect to industrial heat treatment processes like induction tempering. Controlling the amount and stability of retained austenite is not only relevant to the properties of Q&T steels, but also next-generation advanced high strength steels (AHSS) with austenite/martensite mixtures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4984-5005
Number of pages22
JournalMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science
Volume51
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. 89233218CNA000001). AJC, JKT, and KDC acknowledge support from the Center for Advanced Non-Ferrous Structural Alloys (CANFSA), a National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) [Award No. 1624836], at the Colorado School of Mines and AJC, KDC, JGS, and VKE acknowledge support from the Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center (ASPPRC), an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC), at the Colorado School of Mines during the preparation of this manuscript. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. APT research was conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL) Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), which is a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of M.K. Miller and K.A. Powers from ORNL for their tremendous help and expertise associated with the APT characterization presented in this manuscript. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. 89233218CNA000001). AJC, JKT, and KDC acknowledge support from the Center for Advanced Non-Ferrous Structural Alloys (CANFSA), a National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) [Award No. 1624836], at the Colorado School of Mines and AJC, KDC, JGS, and VKE acknowledge support from the Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center (ASPPRC), an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC), at the Colorado School of Mines during the preparation of this manuscript. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. APT research was conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL) Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS), which is a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of M.K. Miller and K.A. Powers from ORNL for their tremendous help and expertise associated with the APT characterization presented in this manuscript.

FundersFunder number
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences
Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
National Science Foundation Industry
University Cooperative Research Center1624836
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science
National Nuclear Security Administration89233218CNA000001
Argonne National LaboratoryDE-AC02-06CH11357
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Colorado School of Mines
Center for Advanced Non-Ferrous Structural Alloys
Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on Quenching and Tempering 4340 Steel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this