Abstract
Future projections of land carbon uptake in Earth System Models are affected by land surface model responses to both CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. The Community Land Model, Version 5 (CLM5), contains a suite of modifications to carbon and nitrogen cycle representation. Globally, the CLM5 has a larger CO2 response and smaller nitrogen response than its predecessors. To improve our understanding of the controls over the fertilization responses of the new model, we assess sensitivity to eight parameters pertinent to the cycling of carbon and nitrogen by vegetation, both under present-day conditions and with CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. The impact of fertilization varies with both model parameters and with the balance of limiting factors (water, temperature, nutrients, and light) in the pre-fertilization model state. The model parameters that impact the pre-fertilization state are in general not the same as those that control fertilization responses, meaning that goodness of fit to present-day conditions does not necessarily imply a constraint on future transient projections. Where pre-fertilization state has low leaf area, fertilization-induced increases in leaf production amplify the model response to the initial fertilization via further increases in photosynthesis. Model responses to CO2 and N fertilization are strongly impacted by how much plant communities can increase their rates of nitrogen fixation and also directly affected by costs of N extraction from soil and stoichiometric flexibility. Illustration of how parametric flexibility impacts model outputs should help inform the interpretation of carbon-climate feedbacks estimated by in fully coupled Earth system model simulations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2879-2895 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2019 |
Funding
R. A. F., W. R. W., B. M. S., K. W. O., and D. M. L. were supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. The CESM project is supported primarily by the National Science Foundation. Computing and data storage resources, including the Cheyenne supercomputer (doi:10.5065/D6RX99HX), were provided by the Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL) at NCAR. W. R. W. was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture NIFA Award 2015-67003-23485 and NASA Interdisciplinary Science Program Award NNX17AK19G. D. M. L. was supported in part by the RUBISCO Scientific Focus Area (SFA), which is sponsored by the Regional and Global Climate Modeling (RGCM) Program in the Climate and Environmental Sciences Division (CESD) of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. The material from J. B. F. is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, terrestrial Ecosystem Science under Award DE-SC0008317 and DE-SC0016188. J. B. F. carried out part of the work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship is acknowledged. J. B. F. was supported in part by the NASA CARBON program. A. W. is supported by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is operated by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 to the United States Department of Energy. C. X. is supported by the United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) Office of Science Next Generation Ecosystem Experiment: Arctic project and the UC-Lab Fees Research Program Award 237285.
Keywords
- CLM5
- biogeochemistry
- carbon
- nitrogen
- parameter
- sensitivity