Abstract
There are multiple algorithms for parallelizing particle advection for scientific visualization workloads. While many previous studies have contributed to the understanding of individual algorithms, our study aims to provide a holistic understanding of how algorithms perform relative to each other on various workloads. To accomplish this, we consider four popular parallelization algorithms and run a 'bake-off' study (i.e., an empirical study) to identify the best matches for each. The study includes 216 tests, going to a concurrency of up to 8192 cores and considering data sets as large as 34 billion cells with 300 million particles. Overall, our study informs three important research questions: (1) which parallelization algorithms perform best for a given workload?, (2) why?, and (3) what are the unsolved problems in parallel particle advection? In terms of findings, we find that the seeding box is the most important factor in choosing the best algorithm, and also that there is a significant opportunity for improvement in execution time, scalability, and efficiency.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER 2020 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Pages | 381-391 |
Number of pages | 11 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781728166773 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2020 |
Event | 22nd IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER 2020 - Kobe, Japan Duration: Sep 14 2020 → Sep 17 2020 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, ICCC |
---|---|
Volume | 2020-September |
ISSN (Print) | 1552-5244 |
Conference
Conference | 22nd IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER 2020 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Japan |
City | Kobe |
Period | 09/14/20 → 09/17/20 |
Funding
ACKNOWLEDGMENT This research was supported by the Exascale Computing Project (17-SC-20-SC), a collaborative effort of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science and the National Nuclear Security Administration. This research was supported by the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program of the U.S. Department of Energy. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Keywords
- Scientific visualization
- flow visualization
- parallel processing
- particle advection